Argonians are awesome. Khajit are human bodies with cat-heads slapped on - can't even be compared. Tauren/Worgen are massively sexually dimorphic, female Tauren/Worgen have big time disney-princess syndrome going on because they didn't want to actually make beastial females. Cause an actually terrifying animalistic werewolf like the male version wouldn't be feminine enough. Thus they humanized them and rid them of any personality they might have otherwise had. They turned into some of the most confused and terrible designs I've ever seen. Burmecians are very slender, human-like including the male ones. They aren't comparable to Hrothgar at all, but you are right in terms of dimorphism. Vulpera are cartoonish and disneylike and thus fall outside the category - the males already don't look like real animals but like comic versions. Bangaa are great but not playable. Charr are probably the best playable female beasts in all of gaming. They are maybe a liiiittle bit too cute in the face but whatever, they don't look like humans.
Femhroths are NOT gonna be to male Hroths what Femcharr are to male Charr. Starting with the eliminated hunch and body proportions which are gonna be completely different.
I don't want a more shapely and furry Femroe with a snout, I want an equivalent to male Hrothgar. An actual beastlike female race to play that isn't cute, sexy or beautiful or in any other way human - at least not anymore than people consider male Hrothgar.There are quite a few cases where what you claimed is definitely not the case lol. My question is, why are you people wanting more of what we already have and wanting it to compete with what we already have, when we can instead have more diversity? The people who want what you're wanting already have multiple options. The people who don't have... zero?
What I want is definitely something other than what we already have. Something for people who like a female version of male Hroths.
What you want is another alternative for Viera to fantasia into. Something that people would be surprised to find the male equivalent to, because they expected them to be upright walking human-shaped slender beaus with cartoonish tiger-faces rather than the hunched proportionally closer to quadrupeds animal-looking actual beast-race they are.
No, which is why I made this thread. So you aren't disappointed. But I guess what I fear will happen is exactly what you actually want. Which is good for you.
Au Ra aren't even as dimorphic as Roe (or as Hroths are going to be) yet they get acknowledged as such where for Roes nobody ever mentions it. Male Au Ra are bigger, but proportionally equivalent to Femra, unlike Roes to Femroes.Like even Au Ra look like they're of the same race, despite the males being comically massive compared to the females.