Quote Originally Posted by Eisi View Post
Remember Femroes, who are nothing like male Roes.

If you were to design the male equivalent to Femroe you would end up with something that looks nothing like male Roe. It would be tall, but lithe and with longer legs and shorter torso. Femroes look way more human than Roebros because they are women. If Femroes looked like a female equivalent to male Roes they would be a lot broader and their proportions would be closer to male Roe.

I expect the same to be true for femhroths versus male Hroths.

Sexual dimorphism in video game races tends to allow male chars to be less human-looking while females still need to be either 1. cute or 2. sexy or 3. beautiful, which means they tend way more in the direction of the human ideal.
...What? Female roes definitely look like male roes though... If you put up a femroe next to a male roe or male hyur, you can clearly see they are more similar to male roes. They quite clearly look different from female hyurs, I'm not sure what femroes you're looking at lol.

Anyways, to counter your last point...
Argonians
Khajiit
Charr
Tauren
Worgen
Vulpera
Bangaa
Burmecian

There are quite a few cases where what you claimed is definitely not the case lol. My question is, why are you people wanting more of what we already have and wanting it to compete with what we already have, when we can instead have more diversity? The people who want what you're wanting already have multiple options. The people who don't have... zero?