
Originally Posted by
Deo14
...
"your bullshit"
"your insistinence on being wrong"
"your underhanded tactics"
"your complaining"
"your inane claims"
"making a clown of yourself"
"cope"
"I don't want to be bombarded with more of your essays"
I'm pretty sure you could go to any culture, say those types of things about people, and find they would take offense. They clearly aren't meant to be flattering. What culture are you from where these things are not negative things to say about a person?
And that's just THIS ONE POST! You've done this same level in all of your replies to me for the last week. I have to wonder what culture you come from where that would be acceptable. Imagine living in a city with someone and every time you run into them at work, at their place of business, or on the street, you said those or similar things about them - that many all at once, at EACH instance of running across them.
In what culture on Earth would that NOT be considered rude and antagonistic?
Also, when you lie about what people say?
Can you find any post where I ever said "every job should be reduced to 29 buttons"? Your claim:

Originally Posted by
Deo14
Then you continued to say that every job should be reduced to 29 buttons,
I think it came up when someone asked me what would be ideal (that someone, btw, was you), and even then, I said different Jobs having more or less is fine, but it shouldn't be every Job HAVING MORE. Here's the pertinent quote:

Originally Posted by
Renathras
For me personally, about 29 buttons is where we should draw the line. That allow for Sprint, LB, and Potion to fit in 32, and 29 is still a lot of buttons. I'm not sure why "29 is too few...but 35 is just right" comes into play, as that's a difference of only 6 buttons.
...
I do agree not every Job is for everyone, though. But there also is an issue of, as the game has more expansions, new abilities are added. There comes a point where it's just too many buttons for ANYONE. Where that is depends on the person - for me it's 29, for someone else it may be 40 - but if we don't see some reductions/combinations in rational and intelligent ways, eventually we surpass whatever that is.
...
It is fine if some Jobs have more. I'm not saying none can. But they should actually have value and justify their place on the hotbar slot, and you should really have down around 16 or so for high use and burst. That's a lot of buttons if you actually think about it. 1-0 and then 1-6 again.
...which people reading would generally find agreeable. "Some Jobs having more and some less than ~30 buttons? Yeah, that makes sense. Buttons should actually have value? Yeah, that makes sense, too. If we keep adding more buttons, sooner or later it will be to much after half a dozen expansions of an average of 2 more buttons per expansion? Yeah, that makes sense, to. Oh, this person thinks 29 is about right for listed reasons (having 3 more for Sprint, LB, and Potion), but doesn't think every Job should be this way? That sounds fair enough, 30 IS a lot of buttons."
And other people there were agreeing with me, so it's not like I was the only one with that view. You were picking fights with them too and attacking their definitions of "button bloat", for crying out loud, which prompted this reply:

Originally Posted by
Shurrikhan
Using more buttons than is necessary to accomplish identical or better ends.
...Seriously, why are we making this about some arbitrary tipping point in button count?
If I give you 3 buttons for Glare that can be used in any order for the same potency, it's still just Glare... and thereby bloat, regardless of whether you have 3 other actions or 30.
In the same sense, there is absolutely no point in having both Huraijin and Armor Crush when you can just have either act as a Huraijin outside of combo and as Armor Crush (but with 30s Huton granted instead of just 30s Huton refreshed) after Gust Blade.
And note I didn't just throw that number out of thin air. Not only did I have a reason for it, but I only posted it at all because
you asked me to:

Originally Posted by
Deo14
So where do you think we should draw the line?
You can't ask a person a question then try to attack them for giving you an honest answer!
You can DISAGREE with their answer, but if
you asked them a question, and they gave you a good faith, honest answer, using that as an attack against them is just wrong - and you ARE using it as an attack, since this is ABSOLUTELY an attack:

Originally Posted by
Deo14
Then you continued to say that every job should be reduced to 29 buttons, so your wittle fingies won't get hurt.
Seriously, who says "so your wittle fingies won't get hurt" in a serious conversation? Especially when that person, in that VERY SAME POST, is insisting their comments aren't meanspirited or insulting? No, that wasn't some cutsey "little bit of sarcasm" or whatever else you're trying to play your abuse off as. A typical thing people abusing and harassing others do is try to downplay their abuse. Verbally abusing someone and then saying "I was only joking" or "It was just a few little sarcastic remarks" when you have a record of abuse across your posts for the last week. The posts are still there. Take your posts this last week, post them without context, just the text, to any neutral website and ask "Does this come across as being mean?" and I'd wager you'll get a lot of people saying "Very much so, yes."
.
Half the time, I think your attacks on me come from you just reading things into my posts that aren't there and then getting mad at your misinterpretations.
I won't bother - again - pointing out you were wrong and you refuse to admit or apologize for it.
Unlike you, I make no such demands. I just want you to stop bringing them up over and over again, because I can't spend every single post proving you wrong just for you to insist you were still right and I'm wrong about you - yet again - misinterpreting what I said. This is true both in the slidecasting conversation AND the NIN conversation. In both cases, you either read something into my posts that wasn't there OR interpreted something wrong. And in both cases, I've corrected the record, but you still insist on your initial wrong impression being true, and that making me wrong, AND use it as an excuse to continue harassing me in other conversations by bringing it up over and over again.
And every time I point out what I meant, you insist that I couldn't have possibly meant that, and that the
mere act of explaining/clarifying so you can understand correctly what I said and meant is me being "underhanded".
So you know, you can't read people's minds. If you say "You said this, it's wrong!" and they say "Look at what I actually said. Notice where I said that and that and this over here. THIS is what I meant", or "What are you talking about? I didn't even say that, here's the post you're referencing and it's not even in there!", then you should listen. If people tell you you are wrong about what
they said or
were trying to say, you insisting they were trying to say something else is you insisting you can read their mind and know their mind better than they do. AT BEST, this is pretty rude. At middle bad, it's you clinging to any thread you can to save face, and doing so at someone else's expense. And at worst, you then using that face saving to attack and harass them is just being bad, especially since you started the crusade in the first place and the other person didn't instigate anything with you. YOU took it upon yourself to be the arbiter of truth and smack them with your judgement hammer, picking a fight you could not win and then refusing to let it go. Note that I never did anything to institute your antagonism towards me. Hell, everyone else in that conversation has long since left it behind - BOTH those conversations - yet you keep bringing them up in thread after thread after thread to try to insist you were right no matter what and impugn my character.
Can you not see how that could
come across as rude or antagonistic? Bringing something up that, to everyone else, is settled and that you were arguably not even right on in the first place and that you weren't even part of the conversation on but chose to interject yourself into, in thread after thread, unbidden and unrelated to the conversations going on in the other threads, and explicitly to damage the perception of a user? How that
might seem to be harassment or a self-appointed crusade on your part?
God, I hope you never get indicted for a crime - you'd consider defending yourself underhanded, apparently.