While I'd hardly say I have a saint's patience, I prefer to continue dealing with less cooperative posters until I absolutely cannot do so any longer or until such a time as they say something that offends my moral values. So far, no one has managed to accomplish this just yet.
In the spirit of fairness, I feel inclined to state that while I concur with you on the perceptions of those first two I don't know for an absolute certainty if I'd have liked to been around for past posts made by the third poster in question. I imply nothing untowards, of course but assuming there is any accuracy in certain tales I've heard I think maybe I can deem myself fortunate to be a late arrival here.
(◔_◔) I really despise petty tribalism. Is me addressing only one "side" the sole umbrage you raise against me? Again, as I was saying earlier I have not found any of the recent threads about positivity and what they enjoy to not have had a hidden angle or second half made for the explicit purpose of putting down those who did not enjoy it as much. Frankly, they did not exactly attempt to conceal what jabs they made neither. Once more, there is no such policy stating that positive posts cannot permit less positive posts. Additionally, I'd very much prefer it if you actually linked to the specific thread in question and since you mentioned it in specificity the post of mine you found disfavourable as well.
I'm perfectly willing to recant and correct myself, but I cannot facilitate that if you keep remaining vague about it. But from what I've observed, too much of what is not actually "calling people out" is such to you so I suspect we shall not arrive at an amenable conclusion together.
Edit: Wait just a moment, were you speaking of this thread:
https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...s-pretty-great
And, more importantly, this post of mine:
I contest the insinuation that statement I made there was in any way discourteous, I was referring to how the OP did not properly research a few of the points she made in her post not saying she wasn't allowed to be positive. A few points, like the longevity of certain content and the non-stable implementation of the portrait system did not match what a good number of players were professing to experience. If I need to cut back on some of the more scathing remarks I will, but so far I've not observed myself to be nearly as worthy of condemnation as you aspire to throw me to.
Not to mention, a good chunk of your posts in that thread were needlessly antagonistic as well.
Like take these for example:
This is not the conduct you claim to desire here on this forum, and some of it is predicated upon false pretenses and rather glaring misunderstandings of people's actual positions. In the future, please cut down on the outrage if you do not intend to remain true to your own professed principles.


Reply With Quote


