Well I think we at a new low .

[Raskbuck]

Is this clearer? Because it's a rewording of exactly what I wrote before:

Until Square Enix experiences declining subscriptions, why would they change a formula that makes them money?

Currently, the game is booming.

If Players keep their subscriptions because they do not want to lose housing (frankly I've been satisfied with FC rooms and Apartments for any 'housing' I want to play with) ... how is Square Enix supposed to know that, unless it hits their pocketbook?

Complaints on the forums, coming from the same 2000 people who log in regularly, isn't enough.

So what you are saying is that we shouldn't provide feedback for the things we don't agree with? Isn't that exactly how 1.0 happened?

I get what you are saying is that we should unsubscribe to prove a point - and lose our houses in the process - but deleting all those hours and collective effort (as well as winning the lottery) would just put the final nail in the coffin for us and make us quit for good.

Or is that what you want? To suppress and eliminate dissenting comments?