Half of a ward being owned by one person

[CatStarwind]

So I will also post the same response to your shameless deflection to ensure other readers understand that you are posting the same baseless arguments on other posts in this forum.

Luckily, my reply to this in contrast is rather succinct:

Yes. First, it's not an argument it's a statement of fact. Second, and in this context, both must be observed as we are dealing with an exploit, which is, as the TOS puts it "taking advantage game system[s]".

To put it simply, a requirement is laid out in how a game system ought to work; in this case the FC purchase and ownership. Strictly from the Requirements, in plain language it limits 1 Service Account, on 1 World to 1 FC plot. Circumventing this with a temporary stop-gap can and is considered an exploit as it is taking advantage of a loophole for a purpose not intended.

Did you know that per the FFXIV Forum Guidelines you are violating one of the listed rules about "Posting a number of posts with the same content"?

Do you?

Funny how you will gladly talk about multiowners "harassing" you, just like you called me a stalker for responding to you a few weeks back, because apparently responding to you is stalking, yet you are the one harassing people because you think you are in the right, when multiple people have proven you wrong by even showing you that it's not in the ToS, and is barely a "guideline" which you can decide to follow or not follow.

To be fair, I try not to bring it up if I don't have to as I'd rather not encourage it. I would however like an explaination how I am harassing anyone. Outside of "participating in a forum".

The rules as they are now is 1 private and 1 fc house per world.

Exactly.

[ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain]

Luckily, my reply to this in contrast is rather succinct

Succinct doesn't make it valid or meaningful.

Instead, you and all readers passing through this post should reference to this post where I have replied in detail to this exact same generic reply by this user so we can keep the conversation and attention in a single post instead of jumping across multiple posts.

[CatStarwind]

Succinct doesn't make it valid or meaningful.

No it doesn't but occam's razor has endured for a reason.

[Divinemights]

I know I encourge people to post in one thread like Japanese players do, but do you realize the rules for housing in 2020 is different than rules for housing in 2023 before you necro this?

[Nepentha]

I know I encourge people to post in one thread like Japanese players do, but do you realize the rules for housing in 2020 is different than rules for housing in 2023 before you necro this?

No. The threads he posted were deleted or locked by mods. So he just necros threads now, regardless of relevance to housing today.

[CatStarwind]

So he just necros threads now, regardless of relevance to housing today.

Except for the part where my initial post explains the relevance? I was directed to these threads because of their relevance after all. Again, post history is public so there's no need to make up things.