1 House 1 FC per DC Only

[PaalHenrik]

Abusing workshops/submarines can allow for some crafty RMTing apparently.

There it is again. The premise for your very first piggyback post. Accusing people of RMT. We've come full circle.

[CatStarwind]

So you are okay with people with entire wards if they were grandfathered, but not okay with people taking entire wards now.

You are a new breed of troll

YoshiP is a troll?

[Reinha]

It's not a bug or an exploit if the official housing guide describes the conditions and steps required to buy additional houses.

[ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain]

If you have something to offer go for it otherwise the goal post moving is getting pretty trite. But for the sake of posterity I will again post the relevant sections.

As always, no answers produced. No evidence produced. No substance produced. Nothing but the same nonsense repeated over and over again. Your answer serves only to mislead passing readers, because that's what you are good at. Let's break this down for the masses shall we?

What you posted:


The lines you quoted are from two separate documentations.
>> The section you quoted for 2.1 Cheating and Botting is directly pulled from the Terms of Service.

>> The line you quoted about Land Ownership is pulled from Additional Plots and Purchasing Guide. This is a completely different entity from the Terms of Service.

--------

The argument you are pushing about Land Ownership does not reside in the Terms of Service, or even indirectly. Details below:

• Land Ownership guidelines are not included in the Terms of Service.
• Land Ownership that exceeds the amount of 1 FC and 1 House is not detailed, identified, or regarded to as a bug.
• Land Ownership that exceeds the amount of 1 FC and 1 House is not detailed, identified, or regarded to an exploit.
• Land Ownership that exceeds the amount of 1 FC and 1 House does not have a consequence with a violation in the same language or nature as section 2.1 Cheating and Botting or other related sections that have consequences tied to actions in the Terms of Service.
• Owning more than one service account is not detailed, identified, or regarded to as an exploit or bug.
• Circumvention of the suggested plot maximum per the Additional Plots and Purchasing Guide does not fall under the pretense of section 2.1 because it does not fit the criteria of being a bug or an exploit.

You have failed to make a valid connection between bug/exploit and multiple house ownership.

--------

If anything, the content and nature of your posting and the misinformation you continue to feed into this section of the forum repeatedly violates rules detailed in the FFXIV Forum Guidelines.

Enforcement begins with yourself.

[CatStarwind]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

[Nepentha]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

Dude, don't be disingenuous. We saw the posts you originally made, complete with links and screenshots. And then they were gone, removed. I guess that works in your favor eh?

[PaalHenrik]

Dude, don't be disingenuous. We saw the posts you originally made, complete with links and screenshots. And then they were gone, removed. I guess that works in your favor eh?

Don't forget about the one that was locked by a mod. He thinks it's a victory.

[CatStarwind]

Dude, don't be disingenuous. We saw the posts you originally made, complete with links and screenshots. And then they were gone, removed. I guess that works in your favor eh?

How very convenient for you then. The thread was judged to be in violation to the forum rules and it was removed. While I disagree with the reason, I accept that it was against the rules. It's honestly not that hard to do so, I highly recommend it.

Don't forget about the one that was locked by a mod. He thinks it's a victory.

I mean, did you not read the title of that thread?

[Nepentha]

How very convenient for you then. The thread was judged to be in violation to the forum rules and it was removed. While I disagree with the reason, I accept that it was against the rules. It's honestly not that hard to do so, I highly recommend it.

I've never had one thread removed for violating the forum rules, let alone two.

[Themarvin]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

Please make your own thread to troll in or whatever -_-