Harassment for new healers? How do i block?

[Kaurhz]

100%. Weird how anyone could think random players on these forums are gatekeepers of using the game's customer service that is available for everyone.

OP didn't ask for advice as to whether the forums thought their concern was valid or not. They didn't provide details to vent or get our opinions either, as in "tales from the dutyfinder." They had a simple question that was answered on Page 1.

See, I would have been inclined to agree with the poster if their post implied this:

You can make a report by going to the System menu and then going to the support desk and clicking contact us, and then report harassment. Just keep in mind that repeated, and potentially falsified reports can be sanctionable.

They, however, did not. Just proceeded with a random, and quite frankly irrelevant interjection. Didn't even have the common courtesy of answering the question and wanted to do this...

[AwesomeJr44]

OP didn't ask for advice as to whether the forums thought their concern was valid or not. They didn't provide details to vent or get our opinions either, as in "tales from the dutyfinder." They had a simple question that was answered on Page 1.

Exactly. OP was asking how to use a feature, not asking if people wanted to know why they wanted to use said feature. The most that anyone should have answered with is "This is how you do it, and just be aware that if it's a false report that can be risky". If people wanna have a discussion about false reporting, that's fine but not sure why that has to involve doubting the validity of OP's desired report.

I love forum drama so please let OP elaborate the context so the carnage can begin hahaha

Hmmm... maybe on second thought, we should be demanding that OP elaborate. Forum drama is indeed a delicious breed of drama.



(for the humor illiterate, this is indeed a joke)

[Bladedance87]

It\\'s not. We aren\\'t decision makers for the GM team, how it is staffed, or what reports are worthy of their time. Even if we have opinions, they don\\'t matter here. But you can double down when I\\'m sure what you really want is forum drama.

I love forum drama so please let OP elaborate the context so the carnage can begin hahaha

[Kolaina]

Blabber.

You said they didn’t claim anything. I pointed out the claim. Right in the title of the thread. Why you continue to pursue with me is unknown. You were simply wrong

[ZephyrMenodora]

I love forum drama so please let OP elaborate the context so the carnage can begin hahaha

=D I will admit they said enough to invite questions and curiosity for sure - it's just they don't have to answer them to submit their report.

[Kaurhz]

You said they didn’t claim anything. I pointed out the claim. Right in the title of the thread. Why you continue to pursue with me is unknown. You were simply wrong

Why you continue to double down on semantics is beyond me, I've just pointed out they're not really equivalent, the OP being a matter of making a claim belonging to their own experience and 'feelings' - Nobody has substantial justification to tell anyone how they should feel or what is/isn't valid in this regard, on the other hand, trying to construe their experiences on absolutely no base nor evidence for that matter whatsoever... That you could not refute the previous argument substantially enough really shows who exactly is wrong -here. But hey, you do you.

[Bobby66]

I love forum drama so please let OP elaborate the context so the carnage can begin hahaha

This is the real reason for wanting context. Hell, if people were more open about it we would have less issues.

[Kolaina]

Why you continue to double down on semantics is beyond me, I've just pointed out they're not really equivalent, the OP being a matter of making a claim belonging to their own experience and 'feelings' - Nobody has substantial justification to tell anyone how they should feel or what is/isn't valid in this regard, on the other hand, trying to construe their experiences on absolutely no base nor evidence for that matter whatsoever... That you could not refute the previous argument substantially enough really shows who exactly is wrong -here. But hey, you do you.

It’s not semantics.

[Kaurhz]

It’s not semantics.

Well done if you have actually managed to convince yourself of that.

[Kolaina]

Well done if you have actually managed to convince yourself of that.

Semantics example:
Person A; “put your toys away”
person B; “they’re not toys, they’re action figures”

Not example of semantics:
You; “they said nothing”
Me; “they literally said something”