Fake FCs' Housing Abuse

[ZiraZ]

Are you still mad that the mods closed your thread?

Unless the mod lied to everyone that thread accomplished it's intended purpose with flying colors lmao.
I actually don't remember the last time I even saw a moderator mentioning the feedback was gonna be forwarded to the appropriate parties in the housing subforum.

[Sindele]

It's the textbook diplomatic way to politely send a thread off into the sunset and hopefully prevent it from being made a second, third, or fiftieth time.

I'm sure it was probably forwarded to the community rep team in some fashion, but 'Senior GM rolls by and locks the thread' is.. let's say pretty unusual compared to most feedback threads that earn a response and how they are typically handled. That thread must have been generating a comical amount of reporting. Given how bad the posting is around here on average, I can only dream that it heralds a more aggressive moderation stance.

[PaalHenrik]

Unless the mod lied to everyone that thread accomplished it's intended purpose with flying colors lmao.
I actually don't remember the last time I even saw a moderator mentioning the feedback was gonna be forwarded to the appropriate parties in the housing subforum.

SE is famous for cut and paste responses. Do you need a top up of tin foil?

[Reinha]

Unless the mod lied to everyone that thread accomplished it's intended purpose with flying colors lmao.
I actually don't remember the last time I even saw a moderator mentioning the feedback was gonna be forwarded to the appropriate parties in the housing subforum.

I remember one response from 2017 of a feature that still isn't in the game. Don't get too excited lmao.

Hello again, Eorzeans.

We appreciate your continued feedback on the subject of unlocking the variances in appearance of the Hempen set across all races.

It looks like an overwhelming majority of you are very interested in this! As such, we have forwarded this feedback to the development team. In response, they would like to let you know that they are considering this for a future update!

[ZiraZ]

Don't worry we'll just keep submitting feedback and informing the players about it either way.
If it didn't work we would still have rules that allow for multiple personals to be bought by 1 character.

[Jojoya]

Don't worry we'll just keep submitting feedback and informing the players about it either way.
If it didn't work we would still have rules that allow for multiple personals to be bought by 1 character.

Why do you think other players are ignorant and need to be informed by you?

[CatStarwind]

Why do you think other players are ignorant and need to be informed by you?

Because until one month ago I had zero idea of any of this.

[PaalHenrik]

Because until one month ago I had zero idea of any of this.

You still have zero idea and it becomes more apparent with your piggybacking on others' threads, bringing up dead threads where much of the information no longer applies, and when one thing that pisses you off doesn't pan out, you find another until that pisses you off.

[CatStarwind]

The 1 service account, 1 world, 1 personal and 1 FC dates back to 2018. Even 3 years ago they attempted to patch the exploit but had to roll it back due to technical limitations.

So contrary to lies previously told, they are still very much relevant.

[Nepentha]

The 1 service account, 1 world, 1 personal and 1 FC dates back to 2018. Even 3 years ago they attempted to patch the exploit but had to roll it back due to technical limitations.

So contrary to lies previously told, they are still very much relevant.

You lost all credibility when you said you don't even support instanced housing (which would mean housing for everyone). Your one goal is to take what other people have because you personally don't like it, not to actually make housing better.