Translation: "Ren, you present actual reasoned arguments and ask me questions I don't have the answers to, so I'm going to run from you rather than being an adult and either presenting my case or admitting I might be wrong and don't have one."
Got it.
Again, define "instanced houses". How is getting rid of Apartments (never mind all the people that have those and like those that you're screwing over) and replacing them with this undefined "instanced housing" going to work? Or be cheap? Or not have the technical problems that have been outlined?
Holy shoving words into people's mouths, Batman!Without having any kind of poll or anyone and being so wildly out of touch about the issue that you think people want smalls and they're entitled for wanting anything larger:
...which would cost those oddles and oddles of money and have all the technical problems outlined. You're presenting a solution of "That thing you guys said doesn't work and presented arguments to why it doesn't work and why it'd be expensive? Yeah, that's my solution. I'm just going to pretend there's no cost and no technical problems instead of presenting an argument for why you're wrong that there are."Which would allow for them to not have to actually add anything and just repurpose something else.
Considering in this very discussion someone is complaining - ABOUT THEIR LARGE - because they can't make the outside to their liking in the shared public space for all to see, I'm going to have to ask you for your source that you know people wouldn't be upset and would accept that solution...?I promise you people aren't furious about the fact that they can't place 20 more items in their yard for people in a ward to see. They could just make apartments a magic box, and dozens of people would even be happy with that as lazy as that would be.
No, that's what you're doing.You're back here again spouting this shit as fact when you don't know that.
With vulgarity for added effect.
You're right. I don't. But it's reasonable to suspect, given they haven't done it, that they have good reason not to. Probably expense is a big one considering it requires additional server space, and servers happen to be expensive. To say nothing of the Dev time coding and trying to make it all work.You have no idea how much it would cost,
So would I, but not for housing. Housing is still a niche activity like PvP. The stuff the majority of the playerbase does are dungeons and glamour, not housing and PvP. If we're to be dumping huge sums of money from the game into improvements on the game, let's start with those things that a majority/everyone enjoys (or would enjoy if there was more of it) rather than these niche things that only a small segment of the playerbase cares about and an even smaller amount to great depths....I'd prefer if it was put back into the game.
Ah, more vulgarity. Typical.So please, stop the riding. It's actually really sad.
.
I'm sorry that when people offer you rational and educated information that you don't like, you resort to petty vulgarity instead of accepting you're wrong. Folks like me aren't white knighting, we're explaining reality.
But, given this is your caliber, I see no reason for further engagement. /shrug
You've been told why you're wrong. If you aren't, you should offer counter arguments, not insults and swear words/implied innuendo. If you can't do that, you should realize you're likely wrong.



Reply With Quote





