Quote Originally Posted by Kaurhz View Post
If Person A loses they can still bid on the previous house from Person B. Non-issue.
I will, once again, quote myself on why this doesn't hold up. This quote was in the post you literally replied to btw.

Quote Originally Posted by Avoidy View Post
Even though relocating does technically not result in a loss of plots, think about how many bidders are going to be gunning for those relocation plots this week, compared to the amount of bidders on each plot last week. The competition is gonna be fierce now; it's basically back to "why bother" levels of competition in the lottery again. So yeah, maybe for the first wave of a new ward, turn off relocation in private wards at least so people who don't have anything can have a better chance of getting something.
"But why should someone who already owns a home be subjected to that instead??"
Because they have a home already, so at the end of the day they still have something in this arrangement.

Does this kind of suck for people who already own a home? Yes. But it's a fair way of tackling a shortage in a way that ensures that people who don't have anything can get something. Meanwhile, those who already have something still have something; they just don't have that "something" in a zone they might want it to be.

I'm done now! I simply disagree with you on this. I've stated my case. You guys aren't even willing to read, so I'm out.