Quote Originally Posted by Ayan_Calvesse View Post
Are you being serious here? Because if so you really are making a weak argument; especially if your such a big fan of proving it.

As for 7.0 if the trend continues we will see a new housing district; to claim SE is not taking action to address the need for more housing or will suddenly stop doing so given that they have taken steps is acting in bad faith at best. But hey if your around when 7.0 is announced I look forward to your apology for doubting :-P.

Also to address your arguement about Demo - we are talking about the current issue; not the past.
I'm being serious here. Housing does not exist to tie a player to the game. You can get an apartment with no risk of demolition.

If you want a house, you can sub one month then unsub 6 weeks in a repeating pattern to keep a house in a game you're not playing. You don't have to stay constantly subbed.

What's really dumb is people's insistence that they absolutely must own a house in a game they only play a few weeks a year at most. If they feel tied to the game they're doing it to themselves because ownership of a house does not confer anything mandatory or essential to playing the rest of the game.

If SE follows their "normal pattern" (if you want to call adding 2 housing districts to the original 3 a pattern), we won't see a new housing district until 8.1. We *might* see the addition of more wards depending on how many or how few plots are still available after the remaining new worlds previously announced get added this year followed by the launch of 7.0 in (hopefully) mid-2024.

I don't have anything to apologize for now nor will I when 7.0 is released. But at least we won't have to worry about your access to food for a few weeks because you're going to have a crazy amount of egg on your face.

As for demolition - it is always relevant to any discussion of housing supply in this game. If houses existed to tie players to the game, demolition would never be suspended under any circumstances.