The Problem with Healer Feedback, and requested changes

[Renathras]

An interesting view into a different take: https://youtu.be/mjuxgwVjIKM?t=6706

Obviously, I'm kind of with Happy and Sly on this, but it's always good to remember different people have different perspectives. I'm pretty sure many in here would say that SCH and SGE feel the same, and yet, it's important to remember that a lot of people don't feel that at all.

[Renathras]

We're back to the original problem...

Not really, though. If you are a person that likes being a Dedicated Healer and, when you aren't healing, is fine with 1 button spam, then you're no different than today, and you (presumably) knew this when selecting a Job in that sub-role, so that's getting what you signed up for. In other words, someone like me that would pick that healer and be perfectly content just as I more or less am today.

On the other hand, there's a second option now for players that aren't happy with that, where they can play the Support Healer instead. They start the prog having to do a lot more healing (when it's fun for you), and as your group masters the fight, you shift more and more into your damage and party buff optimization. So you have something fun for you to do early in the fight learning process, and as your party gets better and healing needs are lower, you now have your dps and support kit that you're now flexing and trying to push out more performance from. So you're now better off than today.

Again, this is a case of "At its worst, this is still no worse than what we have."

In other words, what this is for "Dedicated Healer" is what it is for all healers in the current game. So this makes it better for Support Healers (people that want to play them now have something else to push and try to master once the healing picture is down pat), while it's equal/no worse/the same as today for the Dedicated Healers, who presumably would be the people that prefer that.

I'll save you the trip: I miss aggro and positioning as tanks.

I appreciate it. Noticed you post in the Tank Role here as well, so figured you'd probably seen some of it there as I have, if not elsewhere.

Pushing DPS wasn't the only reward, though. Doing things like pushing defensives to solo tank was also something people would try to do, or to tank mechanics in ways that increased party uptime (that is, party dps but not necessarily the Tank's personal dps)

What I mean is, a tank who wants ONLY aggro mechanic, all of their moves converted to say 'generates X potency' instead of damage, etc.

Oh, I agree that there are probably VERY few people that want that (if any), but this is true of Healers. There are VERY few Healers who are arguing to have no damage buttons. Hell, I'm not arguing for that! Can you point out a single poster who has suggested that here? Anyone? Anywhere in this thread?

It's kind of a boogieman. It either doesn't exist or is so small in number that it in effect/statistically/for the purposes of this discussion doesn't exist.

By playing it safe to avoid upsetting people who would panic if the kit didn't contain a Medica analogue, is my guess

Yeah, but that honestly doesn't make sense. It would have been easy to do something like "let's make a Job that appeals to those people that like playing RDM because they want to Vercure the party". I dunno, it seems so simple with Kardia to just make Kardia do roughly the healing of Cure 1 and then give SGE a DPS rotation like RDM level where Kardia heals. It just seems so "no brainer". You can give it Medica as a fallback, but surely having Medica doesn't mean you can't have any other spells...

Anyway, the point is less about how some groups say 'swap from SGE to SCH cos it's 100 dps more', this idea runs the potential for people to say 'swap from Dedicated to Support, cos it'll get us literal thousands more DPS'

Two things:

1) People are going to do this anyway no matter what. Seriously.

2) The gap probably wouldn't be literal thousands more DPS. It would probably be something like 5-10%. Enough to be noticeable, but not enough to be the difference between clearing Enrages or not.

You really wanna see toxic midcore players who have no idea how to understand what caused a wipe,

I know I sound like a record at this point but -this happens in live all the time, it just happens to all healers.

Again - at its worst, this idea is no worse than/is equal to what we have in live. If healing fails, it'd still be due to both healers (if the Support is greeding instead of helping heal, then that's on them, just as it would be today if Healer 2 was greeding damage while the party was dying and Healer 1 isn't able to keep them all up alone) as well as the party.

It's because mechanics target certain players.

Note Ex1 I specifically pointed out because...it has no such mechanics. And for the others, I think a lot of those are hardcoded to pick a Tank if one Healer is dead or not present. I believe Ex2 does this as you note, which is why it could be solo healed (and solo tanked).

As for the curveball - one thing I do envy WoW for (there are a few, but this one in particular) is that large raid sizes allow them to do things like make the assumption you'll have 4-5 healers or you'll have one of each class present (in cases of class unique buffs/abilities) and so on. And specs allow a player to swap (I think their armor now works, too - once upon a time PLDs had to have STR gear for Protection-Tank and Retribution-Melee, but INT plate for Holy-Heal, but I think now when you swap spec it has that other stat on it and you just get to use it now), so you can have a 3 or 4 tank fight since it's expected someone in the party can swap to their tank spec and off-tank/add tank one of the adds.

It allows for some interesting variation in fight mechanics and design and stuff that FFXIV sadly can't do (netcode and the rest aside)

Set aside the Savage for now, lets use Normal mode raids. If we want to have the roles really stand out, I'd estimate Dedicated healers would have to be 2x as strong on HPS output as Support Healers.

I don't think that's actually necessary. You COULD make it that way, but that seems a little odd to me. I'd do it more like 1.25-1.5x, and have it where the Support (like SCH with Energy Drain vs Lustrate/Soil/Indom/Excog or like SGE using any GCD heal vs Dosis-Kardia) using a lot of healing cuts into their damage output. In this way, if you had 2 Support, you'd be doing slightly less healing than a Dedicated AND low damage. Note the "a lot of". Some healing would be "free" and easily accessible, but a Support having to bulk heal would be inefficient at it by comparison. Plenty for clearing dungeons and 24 mans, but in highly tuned encounters, would ideally want to use its oGCDs and refrain from using its resource or GCD heals. So you could run 2x Support, but they'd be bringing almost no damage to the table (imagine a SCH spamming Succor and Lustrate), and they'd both have to be doing this to meet the healing that could be met by 1 Dedicated + 1 Support's off-healing suite.

For a ballpark, a Support's offhealing suit should supply about 50-75% of what a Dedicated's heals do, where getting that other 25% would require cutting into their damage and support at a strong diminishing return. Two Support using just their off healing set would do less healing than a Dedicated, but 2 Support using ONLY healing (foregoing damage entirely) would be able to heal more than a SINGLE Dedicated. So something in the ballpark of 1.25-1.5x, not 2x, is more where the tuning should be.

The reason you wouldn't do this is you'd rather your Dedicated cover most healing and your Support be able to add their damage and buffs to the party's overall output. You also want to ensure Support have the healing they need for stuff they might solo heal, like 4 mans or roulette 8 and 24 mans.

Likewise, in damage, a Dedicated going full damage, no heals outside of random oGCDs (e.g. 6.0 WHM) should do roughly 80-90% of the damage of a Support. Note that this isn't their standard damage while healing, this is if they effectively forego all healing. Their damage during periods where they heal would be much lower, because their GCDs would be more devoted to healing and they'd have a smaller oGCD heal kit than the Support since they'd be designed more for active healing rather tan occasional weave healing. This means if they're soloing content or doing content they don't need to heal much (4 mans, etc; casual stuff), they can still contribute enough DPS to now slow their party down much over taking a Support instead, but when doing high end, more tightly tuned content, their normal damage contribution would be lower until their party learned fights enough to not need much healing.

I dunno the magic numbers, but I think basically Dedicated doing 1.25-1.5x healing of a Support (when both are going full on healing, and the Support there would be losing a lot of DPS to do so) while the Support does roughly 1.25-1.5x damage of a Dedicated (when both are going full on damage, and the Dedicated would be losing a lot of HPS to do so). Yin and Yang, mirror images in symmetry.

But again, I'm not sure it's the best solution. It was just a thought experiment.

a new level 93 trial,

...would be casual content, so designed where it could be solo healed by any healer, which is MORE OR LESS how casual content is designed today.

You can solo heal Ex1, I'm pretty sure you could solo heal the MSQ story trial version of it.

CDs are left unused, Gauges are left capping.

And this matters in casual content...why?

And I get the feeling that, as a Dedicated Healer class,

Yes. And that's literally the point.

I'm a bit confused why...you're confused on this?

We've talked a lot about the two (realistic, not the Assize runner 0 DPS legend, and not the "Green DPS" healer that spams Glare even as the party dies because they refuse to do any healing and really want to be a DPSer; these are two edge cases that do not, for practical purposes, exist) types of healers. One time is perfectly content spamming one spell over and over and over again. They would be perfectly happy with this outcome.

As many times as we've talked about it, it's so strange to me that I'm still having to say it. And I don't mean this as a "herp derp you no get easy thing Krunk smash get!"; I mean more in a "I get that we think differently, but it's kind of astonishing to me how differently, and I wish I could figure out how to bridge that communication barrier."

The whole point of this exercise was to see how a healer that would appeal to you (Support) would work under such a paradigm. A healer that would appeal to me (Dedicated) is already more or less what we have in the game right now and what I and people like me are content with. We wouldn't be upset to play them in this scenario since we're not upset to play them now, and what you cite as boring here is exactly what we'd be perfectly fine with, if not even actually want.

The point is, you would have a different option that would entertain you, and the interplay between the two would create more dynamic healing in high end play (where it mattered and where you'd want 1 of each at least while progging), which would be an improvement over what we have today of "Oh, some healing, here's some oGCDs, go away now and let me Dosis...", which I understand you find terribly dull. Right now, there's no give and take. Each healer is perfectly interchangeable with the others. Which, if nothing else, is kind of boring.

Aside: You use Krasus? I use Zoe more than I use Krasus. Huh. And you didn't use Panhaima on the second pull? I tend to use Haima for one and Pan for the other. I also can't believe you didn't use Holos. Not because you need it, but it's just such a gorgeous animation, I always use it in stuff. Then again, I tend to use more buttons because I like to use more buttons to see how much I can get away with, especially on SCH.

this would be the average EX roulette too. Stuff just doesn't hit hard enough to justify it. It can't,

BarbiEx has entered the chat.

Seriously, people were wiping routinely to Knuckle Drum. Clearly the Devs aren't tuning things the way you think they are. Go to Barb in min ilevel and try to solo heal it. You might be able to, but I don't know if you can. I remember trying at the time (because PF consistently graced me with healers that liked to be floor tanks) and it wasn't really doable, and that wasn't even min-ilevel. And if I did manage to drag the party through one set of insane mechanics, I didn't have CDs left for the next. And I can't tell you how many times I had other healers say "No, I'm using THIS CD here because I say so, I don't care what lines up or what doesn't" and so on. When they didn't just stay silent and do wth ever they wanted to anyway.

Yeah, Ex content, current Extreme content, very clearly doesn't have the "have to protect the healers from stress" thing going for it all the time. Ex5 is quite a bit more lax (because 80% of the healing for the entire fight is crammed in about a 40 second window and the other 20% is spread across the entire rest of the fight...), but Ex4 wasn't like that at all.

I wish I could figure out how to express to you what the people who don't like your playstyle do and don't enjoy. I'm not sure how, and there's definitely a concept/communication barrier there, but if we could bridge it, it would probably go a long way towards understanding.

I guess maybe think of the 4 Healers we have right now in FFXIV, in the live build of the game...in PvP:

If you haven't done so (I figure you have, but not sure), try PvP with WHM, SCH, and SGE. Note how different they are. I RARELY top healing on SCH, but I get a ton of assists from Adlo spread/Consolation and Bio spread (and Mumification sometimes). I can barely play SGE in PvP. If I'm a squishy, I prefer being towards the back, and on SGE, half the time I can't hit any enemy, which makes healing allies hard. I've seen a few do it, but SGE's tend not to top healing, either, though they do get some kills and do good damage, and their LB has some neat tactical uses.

On the other hand, WHM (the one I prefer) has NEAR spamable heals between 2x Cure 2, its short CD, its bulk healing (Adlo heals a lot less, Seraph is a LB CD, and SGE has to hit enemies to heal), and if I can get in a quick/safe Seraph Strike, a Cure 3 and Protect (from Seraph). WHM LB also generates a combination Temperance and Medica 2, and has the shortest Healer LB CD, making this kind of a CD limited "Medica 2 with benefits". I'd honestly prefer swapping Seraph for just Cure 3, but every now and then I get a kill with it. Miracle can also be good for preventing those annoying DRKs (DRK is the meta right now because their LB is kinda busted) from doing that annoying "I have 1 HP but am going to live" thing, as well as some other classes (NIN by running, WAR by being WAR) from recovering even with my entire team bashing on them. Oh yeah, it does Stun and does enough damage (it's always hilarious to me when I get multiple Knockouts from it - I think my record Knockouts from a single one was like 9 or 11...S rank in the middle on Nadaam and I was able to line up and basically nuke BOTH enemy teams ), but the healing and mitigation is the selling point outside of chokepoint denial uses, which SGE is better at with Mesotes.

For outright attacks, WHM has two, a spam (Glare) and a ranged AOE on a CD (Misery). Seraph is a meleeish (because it forces you into melee) attack, but I rather think of it as "Cure 3 + Protect", and an LB which is "Medica 2 + Temperance + Stuns bad guys". Cure 2 as a powerful on demand heal, Aquaveil as a frequently available and strong barrier (plus Esuna), and Miracle of Nature to round out the kit with a little bit more crowd control. I know you might be inclined to focus on its damage kit, but its healing kit is what is more the draw here.

It's 7 buttons yet has a pretty complete kit. Again, only change I'd really make is to make Seraph just a Cure 3 + Protect so I don't have to engage in melee as a squishy and have an AOE heal (I miss that from before 6.0), but that's a relatively minor quibble. A part of me would like old PvP Cure 1 back (spamable, no MP cost, no CD) and Rapture (AOE), but honestly, the cure 2 CD is short enough it's ALMOST always up when I need it to be, and if Seraph was changed for Pro-Cure 3, that would be the AOE heal that's missing and basically fix all the issues I have with it...

Despite PvP SCH only having THREE attack buttons, I've seen it pretty widely praised by people that like to play a Support/Healer hybrid role, and it has some pretty neat button interactions and player decisions such as whether to use Deploy on an Adlo to buff the party or on an Bio to debuff the enemy team. PvP SGE has roughly 5 damage buttons (if you count Eukrasian Dosis), does damage by healing to the point of not doing any direct healing at all, and has a bit of a combo thing going between Eukrasia, Eu Dosis 3, into Toxicon 2. Both SCH and SGE want to watch the CD interactions of their abilities, for example SCH making sure they have an Adlo or Bio up when they use Expedience so they can boost it and then a Deploy up so they can spread it, or SGE wanting to pair Eukrasia CDs with Toxicon ones after using Eu Dosis to empower Toxicon 2.

.

Point is, in PvP, WHM is a Dedicated/Pure Healer (more or less), SCH is a Support (Buff/Debuff) Healer, and SGE is a Support (Damage/Mitigation) Hybrid Healer. I haven't played it, but I think AST is even stronger in the buff side of things (SCH has some but also plays to the debuff side of the table), and even with few buttons, they have pretty well rounded kits.

In a game with a more varied combat system (Everquest, early WoW before they themeparked it, etc), I would love to see those four sub-roles actually used. But them being flavors of ARR Dedicated and Support would be neat to see.

Definitely since 6.0 there have been a lot of people praise the PvP healing model.

[ForsakenRoe]

I guess my main concern about it comes from a place of how I enjoy the raids: I like to challenge them as soon as they come out. The lower the gear level we have, the more fun it is to me. Being in P5S now, we can live through certain mechanics with no shield and no mit, that would oneshot us in week 1 gear. Getting BIS allows us to be lazy with gameplay, in that sense. So, I guess the way I'd word my concern with the idea is...

'If I'm challenging the raid week 1, then the people who are also challenging it week 1 probably have similar mindsets to me. This would mean that, while I want to be a Support Healer because I'd find it more fun, THEY would want to as well, for the same reason. Thus, we'd see a shortage of Dedicated Healer in the PF unless people are willing to flex. But if I were to flex, I'd be on the class with the healing style I specifically chose to get away from' Which just makes me think about how it is now. If a party has a healer already it's pretty likely it's a WHM.

As for PVP, yeh, I'd say I'm fairly familiar with the healers there. But while you praise the healing side of the classes, I prefer their damage and CC sides. For example, Cure 2 has a cast time. In a gamemode where 'you are dead' is decided for a NIN's LB at the moment it's cast, that cast time means Cure 2 isn't as good as it could be. If they knocked it from 12k to 10k and made it instant I'd agree that it's cool. But as it stands, I'm mostly using it as a replacement for my own HP restore OGCD whatever it's called. I think Seraph is very cool as I'm already in melee range, getting stuck in and standing on the crystal, so it's gapclose doesn't have much bearing on me. Cure3 is 'a nice bonus', it's cool to help sustain people as we push, but I don't rely on it. Misery > Seraph is almost half a HP bar in an AOE, so WHM has fairly good kill potential. Miracle is very good for hitting someone at 50% to secure the kill, like a slippery NIN, a tank so they cant selfheal, or an enemy healer so they can't heal others. And the Regen could be removed entirely from Purgation and most wouldn't notice. Remove the stun though, and a LOT of people would.

So you're right, we do prioritize different things. I prioritize offensive play, you prioritize defensive. Problem is, CC (and PVE to an extent) is a very offense-oriented gamemode. So everything I think, I'm thinking about how it affects my offensive capabilities. I'm not placing Adlo in PVP to help keep an ally alive. I'm placing it because it makes them do more damage. The shield is just sprinkles on top.

edit: yeh I use Krasis, why would I not? Pair it with Soteria, it'll make Kardia hit for like 7-8k per tick. Reason I don't use Zoe (I do, just not here) is because it only affects GCDs. So if I didn't need GCDs, I didn't need Zoe. I guess you use E-Diag more than I do, hence what you said, but even then, you can put Krasis on the tank first, then Zoe E-Diag them for an even bigger shield

[Renathras]

I guess my main concern...

I think at the end of the day, this depends mostly on us, the playerbase.

As I said, the super hardcore min-maxers are gonna min-max always. They do so now. A min-max, world first party's tank isn't a PLD main or a GNB main. They're a "tank main". They have all four tanks, they have all the BiS gear for all four tanks, and they even swap their materia (if necessary) between fights if they switch to a different tank or need to swap out something to get to a critical threshold of skill speed or whatever. That level of top play is like the World Series or Superbowl. Those people are doing whatever it takes to win. Split clears, omni-mains, whatever. There's no way to out-engineer them. They invented split clears to out-maneuver lockouts and have enough alts (also max level and well geared) to pull it all off.

...then there's the rest of us.

Most of the rest of us kind of go with what we have. If you have a SCH/SGE in your static or friend group...well, if you're more casual and more friends, you go with SCH/SGE. If you're in a more hardcore group, you probably include in your rules that you're recruiting "1 Pure and 1 Barrier Healer", and those are their jobs in the party. Maybe they work out among themselves that one will play AST if this fight needs it and the other might play WHM if that fight needs it, but the point is, your group establishes those guidelines when it creates itself.

As for PF, I doubt there will ever be a shortage of Dedicated Healers simply because most people will consider them easier. Again, look at those Lucky Bancho numbers. There are roughly (not QUITE, but roughly) as many WHMs as both SCH and SGE together. And SGE is arguably an "easy" healer (as contrasted with SCH and AST) and is the second most popular everywhere but JP where SCH is second and SGE third but pretty close behind it. Despite AST/SCH being meta, it hasn't taken over the game, and there are no shortage of WHM and SGEs (the non-meta picks) in PF. My FC's main Static that drafts me as a sub healer from time to time has a SGE and WHM, and when I sub in, it's usually for the WHM player, so I play WHM (since I hate AST) to fill the other sub-role.

I'm not saying it does nothing at all, but I don't think there will ever be a shortage of "the easier thing that more people play in the live game right now". And this has always been true. I think even in SB WHM was the most played healer, despite it very clearly sucking.

Though for the record - if you're challenging Week 1, isn't that the time you would actually enjoy flexing to a Dedicated Healer? When Healing is actually challenging to you and not boring?

Anything could happen, but given the game's history, how it's worked in the past, and how the playerbase plays now, I don't think that's really a concern. And after week 1 or 2, it wouldn't matter anyway, like as not. Groups that know the fight and avoid all damage that is avoidable could PROBABLY be 2x Support healed if their party really wanted to push that. Ones that want more of a safety buffer would keep the Dedicated/Support the whole tier. Again, what this allows is options for the party to choose how they want to do things, which I think is generally a good thing.

.

Oh, I always use Recouperate (the self HP restore) on myself. If I need Cure 2 on myself because I'm out of Recouperate, Cure 2 is likely not going off in time and I'm dead anyway already. I've saved a lot of people with Cure 2. It's useful to find something like an ally DRK and follow about 30 yards behind them, using Cure 2 and Aquaveil on them and watching them destroy enemy packs. 10k heal instant cast already exists, I think, that's on AST with Benefic. I think it's 5k scaling up to 10k, and with a 4k HoT. And you can dualcast it since AST has that dualcast mechanic.

I don't play CC, just Frontlines, so melee range is OFTEN (though not always) a death sentence. The only time you can us Seraph and not get instagibbed is if a tank on your team pulled a lone enemy into your team's ranks, or on Shatter, you can sometimes get away with using it on the ice crystals (though sometimes the enemy will try killing you then, too). The problem is the healers have WAY too low HP in PvP for melee. SGE is the worst of them all. I think it has lower HP than any other Job, and I'm not sure why. The worst part about Seraph is the one time I would want to use it - when I'm Heavy/Bound - it can't be used. The one time it WOULD be useful, it CAN'T be used!

The problem with "almost half an HP bar" is (a) that depends on the Job (melee all have stubbornly large HP pools) and (b) unless LB is up, that's ALL of your damage potential, meaning if you don't get the KO, the enemy lives. Maybe CC is more coordinated, but in Frontlines, I can't tell you how many times I've gotten someone below 10% and my team just...lets them run away and potion. And if it's a NIN or something, no way I'm keeping up with them on WHM, lol Agree with Miracle, though, and that's how I use it. That or to just get some annoying enemy off my team. Like the enemy WAR that gapcloses into our party to stun and lock people down trying to attack the Ice on Shatter, slap them with a Miracle and they're unable to do, freeing pressure from the team (and often allowing people to delete the WAR)

The Regen on Purgation is HUGE. Man, if you aren't using that, you're missing out. That's like saying a SCH using Adlo on their party (or Bio on the enemy party) most wouldn't notice. You might be right that people don't actively notice it, but that's how force multiplier powers work. The sustain is actually pretty significant. Something like 1/4th to 1/2lf of your team's health over the duration, and it's AOE and passive. That's huge for survivability, which in turn means your allies having more staying power to kill more bad guys.

Problem is, CC (and PVE to an extent) is a very offense-oriented gamemode. So everything I think, I'm thinking about how it affects my offensive capabilities.

Agree we do think differently. Frontlines is offense-oriented as well, but like the PvE calculation of "Should I cast Glare or should I cast Raise on the dead DPS?", keeping allies alive means more damage to the enemy. And while Frontlines are offense-oriented, they are not always DAMAGE oriented. Take Seal Rock, for example. While kills get you points, the SS rank tomealith gives you more. If you can keep the tank at the base of the tomealth alive with healing and defensive buffs (or offense down from Spread-Bio), then your team is racking up points to win without necessarily even having to get kills. In practice, keeping your party alive DOES translate to more kills, too, mind you.

PvE is also offense-oriented, but also objective oriented. Every mechanic is an objective. Most content (not all, but most) does not have a super strict damage requirement - not one that makes any standard comp unviable, anyway. That is, if your DPS are all parsing green, you could probably clear fights even if your tanks and healers are parsing gray. Some things more than others (Ex5 has an especially lenient DPS check as long as you smartly prioritize adds in the add phase) such that, if you meet the general objectives (mechanics without deaths or damage downs), you can generally clear the damage check Enrages in this game without too many issues. A lot of PF wipes aren't people not doing enough damage. They're people with Weakness because of failing mechanics. It's why once PF groups stop having deaths and everyone does the mechanic right, you tend to get clears. Again, this isn't true in all fights, but it's true in most.

EDIT: Hm...I dunno, I just find it very limited being single target and SGE having no Deployment Tactics-like mechanic. Krasis, that is. SCH with Recitation and Protraction makes sense because I can Spredlo the super shield it generates with Adlo. SGE doesn't have that, so I tend not to think of it that way. Though I guess I DO use Zoe like that. I also often use Zoe with Pneuma because...it's a frankly absurd amount of healing. 600 + 50% is a 900 potency AOE heal for the entire party. It's like party-wide Cure 2 that also shoots a big flashy laser that...well...only does 1 Dosis worth of damage, but it still looks pretty. Party Cure 2 is just bonkers. It's actually stronger than that, since Cure 2 is only 800 potency (1/8th or 12.5% stronger). Pneuma is the same heal as Cure 3 (though DPS neutral), but with Zoe, it's probably the most powerful bulk heal in the game. AST may have something crazy, but I don't know that WHM or SCH have, under self buffs only, anything to match that level of raw healing. MAYBE Fey Illumination + Recitation + Indom on SCH.

WHM can provide more healing via sustain, and Cure 3 + Assize weave does a bit more (1,000 partywide), but requires Assize being up.

Needless to say, pairing Zoe with Pneuma can generate some nice results.

Though I didn't think Krasis boosted Kardia/Soteria healing. I guess I hadn't considered Dosis' healing to be classified as a "healing spell" as I thought the Kardion effect was kind of its own thing. But if so, that's amazing. Going to have to keep that one in my back pocket now.

[ForsakenRoe]

EDIT: Hm...I dunno, I just find it very limited being single target and SGE having no Deployment Tactics-like mechanic. Krasis, that is. SCH with Recitation and Protraction makes sense because I can Spredlo the super shield it generates with Adlo. SGE doesn't have that, so I tend not to think of it that way. Though I guess I DO use Zoe like that. I also often use Zoe with Pneuma because...it's a frankly absurd amount of healing. 600 + 50% is a 900 potency AOE heal for the entire party. It's like party-wide Cure 2 that also shoots a big flashy laser that...well...only does 1 Dosis worth of damage, but it still looks pretty. Party Cure 2 is just bonkers. It's actually stronger than that, since Cure 2 is only 800 potency (1/8th or 12.5% stronger). Pneuma is the same heal as Cure 3 (though DPS neutral), but with Zoe, it's probably the most powerful bulk heal in the game. AST may have something crazy, but I don't know that WHM or SCH have, under self buffs only, anything to match that level of raw healing. MAYBE Fey Illumination + Recitation + Indom on SCH.

WHM can provide more healing via sustain, and Cure 3 + Assize weave does a bit more (1,000 partywide), but requires Assize being up.

Needless to say, pairing Zoe with Pneuma can generate some nice results.

Though I didn't think Krasis boosted Kardia/Soteria healing. I guess I hadn't considered Dosis' healing to be classified as a "healing spell" as I thought the Kardion effect was kind of its own thing. But if so, that's amazing. Going to have to keep that one in my back pocket now.

Yep, you're right that Kardia heals aren't a healing 'spell', but since Krasis says 'healing actions', it affects everything. GCDs, OGCDs, Kardia, incidental selfhealing from Souleater/Path/BrutalShell/HolySpirit, etc. Week 1 WAR in P7S was hilarious, as you could just Krasis-Soteria them for the TB bleed, and their '2700 total potency' Equilibrium would handle it almost all on it's own. I do Krasis Physis Kerachole on every pull, so the Physis regen is buffed by Krasis, and the Kera regen by both. I'm aware of the whole Zoe-Pneuma thing, but there's also times I'll use it on E-Prog during, well, prog, for a bigger safety shield. As for what other classes can do to match it, Cure3+Plenary is 800, and you can get 4 of them in PI's 10sec window. Without losing DPS, charged Star is 720, and PI Rapture is 600, so those are 'equal to Pneuma' at least. Macrocosmos is Macro, and instantly detonating Lily (while being a complete waste) would be 1000. SCH is unique I guess, in that it's not actually so great at recovering lost HP, instead being VERY good at making sure it wasn't lost in the first place. The point of the pic is to show, 'this is how little I need to complete an EX', and I don't mean in an ego sense, I mean 'we need to stop giving healers more healing tools every expansion, because we just don't need them all'. In higher content, yeh I'll use more of them. Heck, Pepsis gets used (sometimes) in P8S like, once, for a HPS check. But if we go to next expansion, and we have 3 more healing skills added, chances are that'd just mean 3 more red X's on the pic.

As for whether I'd be willing to flex in the week 1 hypothetical, it depends on the balance. I'm assuming HPS total required would be the same as now, just redistributed from the 'supports' to the 'dedicateds', in which case, probably not. I didn't find stuff like JWaves interesting, cos my job there was to press Medica a lot, and then when it got to 5 stacks, press Temperance and start using Cure3 instead. Instead, rationing out multiple CDs for Dominion's 3 waves of damage, factoring in other people's mits, having to think 'the DRK can't get this with Missionary, because it's physical', etc, feels a lot more interesting to me. If they ever bring back stuff like 'actually managing your MP economy', maybe, but that'd require them to make Piety not-trash

[Renathras]

Yep, ...

That's really cool. I had it in my head it was like Dissipation or something. I'm going to have a lot of fun with that one now. And yeah, I use it for shields some, too. I guess it's Zoe that's only spells. Though it's still unfortunately single target...but that's still god to know. Might have some fun with it.

Yeah, I feel like there are a lot of things they need to address in 7.0. Setting healers (alone) aside for a moment and looking at the game as a whole, I mean. The overall combat system with the 2 min meta is causing all kinds of problems and people seem to universally either hate it or (those that don't) not care and wouldn't mind its removal. I haven't seen a TON of people praising it, and even the people that kind of like it (for it supposedly being an improvement over ShB in terms of coordination) often are still willing to admit it's caused a lot of problems.

Going further, stats are just wonky. Giving a BLM spell speed is actively screwing them up. Giving anyone skill speed throws off their rotation and causes them to have to do weird stuff like add another filler (which can cause issues with combo classes) to avoid abilities drifting to the left/early out of buff and burst windows or mechanic alignment. Crit feeds into Crit chance AND Crit damage, meaning the more Crit you have, the more Crit you want, and it affects all output (healing and damage). This makes it better than the other stats that do so but only scale linearly like Tenacity (for tanks) or Determination (for everyone else). [EDIT: It already caused problems with Crit buffing abilities vs Jobs with attacks that are automatically Crit/Crit-Direct Hits, requiring THAT to be tweaked.] Further, there's also Direct Hit, which is basically Crit by another name that doesn't scale as well and only affects damage, not healing.

This creates a meta in where Spell Speed and Skill Speed buffs are not desired or even detrimental and their materia are only used to hit specific thresholds, and where Crit simultaneously devalues Determination, Direct Hit, and Tenacity. And in all of that, Piety is, while still a "to taste" stat on healers (as well as Spell Speed), a "You can meld this to taste...but any you get over what you absolutely NEED is a waste."

It limits both potential buff options (party synergy) and gear choices, and also makes a lot of stats seem entirely useless. Like why do we even HAVE Tenacity materia at this point? Or Skill Speed? They could just natively balance the Job abilities or gear to have the right amount or make remove the stats entirely balancing rotations to fit the 60/120 mold and be done with it.

Healing aside, there are a lot of things they kind of need to start looking at, and 7.0 or 8.0 would probably be the best time to do it.

[ForsakenRoe]

Yep, back when DHit was added I thought to myself, why not split Crit into Crit Rate and Crit Strength? Think about SB job designs for a moment. BRD and MNK specifically. They had 'if you crit, you get a proc' (MNK still does), so you'd have choices: Crit STR and DET focus, for hard hitting (but less common) crit Pitch Perfect/TFCs, or you could go Crit Rate and Skill Speed, for a lightning fast gameplay style where you might not Crit as hard, but you're critting very often. They got SAM completely right in SB, with base, 1k-ish and 2k-ish SKS all being like 1% apart on DPS, so I imagined they'd be able to get the balance sort-of right between Speed-MNK and CritHard-MNK.

As for now, if I were working on design at SE? I'd focus on making Piety and Tenacity rebalanced to be 'slightly more desireable than DET'. I feel like DET is the 'fallback' catchall stat of 'it make number go up' in the most boring sense. Like a simple idea I had in SHB was to give WHM mobility (the 2.5s cast times were kinda bleh imo). Now, some people liked those cast times as it made you unable to move well, meaning lilies became a 'movement optimization tool', and I wanted to keep something for them. So:

Water/Water2/Water3/Banish
Cast time: instant
1000mp cost
Deals 200/250/300/350 potency damage

So the optimization would be 'use Banish in raidbuffs, keep enough MP to not screw yourself for the rest of the fight'. A very expensive Ruin 2 alternative. But it'd also give a way to dump the spare MP that Piety provides, meaning that the Piety heavy Crafted set wouldn't suck so much, you could make up for the 'lack of damage cos where's my crit SE' by using Banish more often. Now, we don't need a design like that anymore, because every healer has 1.5s cast times, and I can only come up with an idea that is 'solid enough that I feel confident in pushing it' for SGE, via the big ol' list of reworks I posted. Whatever the solution, I'd like it to be fairly healer-centric though, something that justifies Piety being a healer specific stat, as Tenacity tries to with 'added mitigation'. Even if it's something as simple as 'for every X Piety, your DOT tick is 1 potency stronger' or something. Shame Mastery doesn't exist as a stat, I'm sure I could come up with Masteries for each job. Like 'AST: Improves the % damage increase granted by cards', WAR: 'Greatly increases the potency of Wrath Gauge spenders', or RPR: 'Increases the potency of your Avatar (including Enshroud)' They'd never want to do something like that though, too hard to balance

[Shurrikhan]

Yep, back when DHit was added I thought to myself, why not split Crit into Crit Rate and Crit Strength?

Because "the best-returns equilibrium is literally 50/50" is hard to understand. /s

Honestly, I have no idea. When they mentioned a replacement for Accuracy, I had kind of hoped that they'd just replace the bimodal Hit/Miss distinction with a curve (0-200% damage), kind of bell-curved around 100%, and with zero chance above 50% prior to Crit contribution nor below 50% prior to enemy Evasion). Then have Determination (still the simple % potency amp), Expertise (shifts curve right), and Break (extends the right/positive wing of that curve).

Overcomplicated, I know, but that's just what I had in mind at the time, mostly because it'd allow for further mob-type distinction and could allow for a dodge-tank aesthetic to actually be mechanically viable.

As for now, if I were working on design at SE? I'd focus on making Piety and Tenacity rebalanced to be 'slightly more desireable than DET'. I feel like DET is the 'fallback' catchall stat of 'it make number go up' in the most boring sense.

Honestly, as with Direct Hit right now, I don't think they add a damn thing at present. Even made sometimes desirable*, I'm not sure I'd be a fan, as it just means fight-specific BiS lists (which some will like and some will hate) in order to eek out extra tank damage opportunities or become unkillable even under poor management of mitigation or as not to run short on MP despite a particularly MP-consumption-heavy fight.

* This, I suspect would be a huge endeavor to support, though a worthwhile effort for its own sake, via again giving tanks more choice (real choice, this time) between direct and indirect contribution (damage and mitigation, most classically) and making MP a real, cohesive, and integral mechanic (not 95% just a Rez charge meter that obliges an extra bloat button).

[Shurrikhan]

Sorry for the late responses. Been busy and the parser thread ate up most of what time I had to spare.

I get that is a unique example, and yes, that's the lore for it, I concur. But it's not the only case. Again, Warlocks can't tank.

Not... officially, but... traditionally they have been viable tanks for quite a few magic-heavy encounters, much like non-tank DKs, Arms Warriors (while Fury were instead good soakers due to self-healing), etc.

The thing is, DPS, already have sub-roles (and are the only role that really does)

A large part of which are already contradictory / unnecessary / mere balance cop-outs. There's no real difference between Striking, Scouting, and Maiming outside of "Hah! This full role should take more than twice as long to gear per job!" nor between Aiming (Physical Ranged) and Casting (Magical DPS) at this point except to say, "We, the devs like the aesthetic of when you have at least one member with a bow/gun/chakram, at least one with a staff/book/focus, and one with no range, and so we'll reward (punish) you for (not) doing that in place of balancing whichever of those groups might otherwise underperform too badly to be taken."

I was referring to healers, but we did have most parties bringing one of each tank to take advantage of their individual pros and cons.

In the perhaps those individual pros and cons were more varied than just "has more damage" but even then, when there were only two tanks and more fights had both tank LB3 checks and DPS checks that'd require a damage LB, it was as much to do with the LB penalty of having repeat jobs... and only two tanks in the game.

I guess what I meant by the asking is that you would probably like (or at least prefer to present) that kind of healing gameplay? Is that an accurate assessment?

That'd depend on what aspects of ARR SCH you're referring to.

Overall, yes, I definitely prefer it to today's SCH. Stormblood, though, if with slight changes to Dissipation, Fey Blessing, and Selene, would probably be the peak to me.

I think this depends on the player. You say [the "CD metronome" can act as a rotational] anchor, but that's only true if there's no drift, no boss mechanics causing you to miss or delay things, no untargetable phases, and you consistently use all CDs on CD.

I would have to say the opposite. The only time "CD metronome" adds to gameplay is when there is drift that one then has active and diverse means to compensate for based on expected further drift before that next occurrence of that "CD metronome". Hence the examples of ShB Tsubame-Gaeshi or Stormblood Hagakure. And if it can't add gameplay in that process of rotational compensation to still optimize it and that's not merely due to a particular fight being pitifully dull in its effortless 100% melee uptime, I would consider that tool to be bloat (like Lucid Dreaming, etc.).

[Renathras]

Sorry for the late responses.

All good.

1 - Other than Twin Emperors in Vanilla, I'm not sure Warlock has ever had a fight where they were SUPPOSED to be a tank. I'm not even sure if they were EXACTLY supposed to be for that fight so much as their kit just worked for it, so it was a lucky coincidence. But there was a point before Warlords, I think, where for a patch there was a glyph for Demonology where they could basically use their transformation as a tanking stance and legitimately tank 5 man dungeons, and some people played around with them doing harder stuff. Sorta like Enhance tanking (which worked up to level 40-45 or so in Vanilla and which someone tanked Uldar with in Wrath...but with the entire raid party supporting that). Unfortunately, it was yet another case where Blizzard decided fun was unacceptable and had to be nerfed. Then they made Demon Hunter as basically the same thing... <_<

2 - Maybe, but I don't mean armor types. Melee vs Ranged vs Caster. Arguably within each there is a further subdivision with each having a selfish Job (SAM, MCH even now, BLM), and then ranges of utility. Ranged (even MCH) are pretty clearly designed for a shoehorned Support Role in a game that refuses to have a Support Role. Each of the other sub-roles have support leaning members, though it's most obvious with Casters having RDM and SMN falling somewhere in the middle. It's not flawless, but it's far more noticeable and impactful than "Pure/Barrier" (which has been an utter failure to the point SCH/SGE is downright common) or "Main Tank/Off Tank" from ShB, which worked so poorly they dropped it. The only "real" Healer sub-role right now is "buffs the party" or "isn't meta outside of niche cases", with WHM getting the shortest end of that stick.

3 - Yeah, I figured SB would be your peak. I was just wondering if you disliked ARR SCH or just liked it...less, I suppose?

4 - I feel like an anchor that moves isn't...really an anchor. Maybe we mean something different with that term. Like on WHM, PoM is an anchor to me. On SCH, Chains Strategem. On RDM, Embolden. NOT Manification. Manification has a 110 sec CD and should not generally be held (optimally) for Embolden because this can cost you a use over the fight, meaning you intentionally drift it to the left out of buff windows. It can't be an anchor because it moves. Embolden, on the other hand, is optimally used on CD (whether or not it lines up with your melee/burst combo) instead of being used selfishly. Embolden is an anchor because it stays in the same place and, as long as you're using it on CD (which you should) gives you a static point of reference and you can use its CD or coming off CD as a metric to know about where you should be in your rotation, where the party is in theirs, if you have a potion window coming up, and can use it for those "Okay, so in about 20 seconds, the Boss should start using X mechanic..." reference points. SOOOO...perhaps we just mean different things by this term, I guess? (Also agree Lucid is dreaming - just bake the MP regen into our base stats at this point, SE... <_< "Oh, you can use it for recovery after you've been Raised!", yeah, but not if it's on CD because of you keeping it relatively on CD if you died at all recently after using it.)