Rebalance for MCH, please...

[Reinhardt_Azureheim]

Yeah, when I'm "suck at it".

Your ability to perform well and showcasing it with a single screenshot of you doing well does not indicate you being a good player, only that you did well in that one match. It has minimal bearing what actually happened in the match. The most I can tell from it is that you either have rarely been focused or played at extremely long ranges and disengaged / LOSed frequently while popping out of cover a lot for damage. However the general skill level of the match is weird if you take a look at your monk for example who only got about 300,000 dmg in the match and had to sit on the Crystal for extended periods of time.

While the choice of words from Gserpent isn't quite noble, he has a point - Machinist isn't great at 1v1s VS jobs actually capable of picking 1v1 fights efficiently, so it isn't surprising when a Machinist will suffer against reasonably skilled players in a 1v1. This is why looking at Machinist balance in the context of 1v1 is somewhat futile.

[Elfidan]

Yeah, when I'm "suck at it".

What exactly is good about this? 9 kills? You're at the bottom of the assist pool and second lowest on healing. You avoided the crystal like the plague and have the lowest damage taken. You barely took highest damage despite having the top kills by a wide margin. This is not really a good example for skilled play even at just a glance. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Kills do not skill make. You're not a sniper and the sooner you figure that out the better.

[RajNish]

Congratulations on winning a casual game.

Casual or not, your skill set is no different. You have the choice to keep complaining about the MCH not being good enough or to use the whole set. However, everything is clear with you.

[RajNish]

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Kills do not skill make. You're not a sniper and the sooner you figure that out the better.

Oh my dude, it's not about the number of kills, it's about the player complaining that MNK kills him because he can't escape like a BRD. If he can't escape and can't resist melee, then he doesn't know what he's doing, that's all. I wish you good luck in standing on the crystal when your team does not eliminate tactically significant targets. XD

[RajNish]

Your ability to perform well and showcasing it with a single screenshot of you doing well does not indicate you being a good player, only that you did well in that one match. It has minimal bearing what actually happened in the match. The most I can tell from it is that you either have rarely been focused or played at extremely long ranges and disengaged / LOSed frequently while popping out of cover a lot for damage. However the general skill level of the match is weird if you take a look at your monk for example who only got about 300,000 dmg in the match and had to sit on the Crystal for extended periods of time.

While the choice of words from Gserpent isn't quite noble, he has a point - Machinist isn't great at 1v1s VS jobs actually capable of picking 1v1 fights efficiently, so it isn't surprising when a Machinist will suffer against reasonably skilled players in a 1v1. This is why looking at Machinist balance in the context of 1v1 is somewhat futile.

Please re-read what I wrote before. I said that the MCH can not only quickly escape but also kill one on one in some cases. To be honest, I don’t care what Gserpent player is, good or bad, or his point of wiev, because he definitely needs to improve his attentive reading skill. And by the way, you too. Because the main idea was not about one on one, but about the use of the entire set of skills. Will you argue with this? Good luck!

[Gserpent]

Casual or not, your skill set is no different. You have the choice to keep complaining about the MCH not being good enough or to use the whole set. However, everything is clear with you.

You're not doing a good job being an ambassador for whatever it is you're trying to prove. You posted a screenshot of a game where the enemy team pretty much ignored you and are trying to use that as something to counteract another person whining about MNK dunking him when he plays MCH.

Like, ???

[RajNish]

Judging by your posts on the forum, you are doing PvP here, theoretically, more than in reality. So... Once again, good luck.

[Gserpent]

Hey man, you're welcome to tell yourself whatever makes you happy. Don't make it true, but as long as you're happy it's good enough right? You're the one that tried to cite a casual queue game wherein the enemy team completely ignored as proof of... something. And then got really upset when multiple people pointed out the issues with that kind of thing.

[RajNish]

You seem to have a tendency to talk to imaginary people in your head. It's already decided that I'm upset. Nah, I just don't give a shit about your opinion. It happens. Calm down and touch the grass.

[Svaelyn]

Balance-wise, the job is more than fine.

I wish they redesigned analysis chainsaw to something more reliable and less toxic though, this kind of mechanic has no place in any kind of PvP.