Results 1 to 10 of 319

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Shibi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,756
    Character
    Lala Felon
    World
    Zurvan
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by vanaii View Post
    Surely they can expand this in the future with a check to make sure the recipient has/does not have the one time use item? They seem to be leaving money on the table.
    Hopefully. Yes.

    Minions is certainly a weird one. They claim this is done to prevent someone getting a gift they already own. However, minions are clearly viewable on lodestone, so it's pretty easy for us to check if our friend has the gift first.

    Hopefully they can smarten it up a bit and do some form of linking to check the recipient's unlocks.
    (11)
    やはり、お前は……笑顔が……イイ

  2. #2
    Player
    AshDidit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    50
    Character
    L'yira Denma
    World
    Ultros
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Shibi View Post
    They claim this is done to prevent someone getting a gift they already own.
    They also claim it's to prevent RMT, then admit RMT can still be done (with a 72 hour delay).
    The thing also says it restricts 'one time use' items but there are tons of those still giftable.
    Feels like a bunch of inexplicable fibbing.
    (5)

  3. #3
    Player
    KyonSoma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    3
    Character
    Kyon Soma
    World
    Kujata
    Main Class
    Culinarian Lv 90

    why

    There's a valid reason of resale and real-life criminal activity but this is the only solution that they can come up with? Maybe if they see the revenue drop, they'll change it back.
    (7)

  4. #4
    Player
    Nav_Fae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    437
    Character
    Mizuchi Hikaze
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Shibi View Post
    Hopefully. Yes.

    Minions is certainly a weird one. They claim this is done to prevent someone getting a gift they already own. However, minions are clearly viewable on lodestone, so it's pretty easy for us to check if our friend has the gift first.

    Hopefully they can smarten it up a bit and do some form of linking to check the recipient's unlocks.
    I actually bought a second emote for myself not realizing I already owned. Wasted 7 dollars and non refundable.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    XaarKrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    16
    Character
    Xaar Krey
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Machinist Lv 90
    Idk, the only think I can think of is: "what if someone else sent that same minion and the player hasn't opened mail yet"

    Still a dumb excuse, though. That can be tracked by squeenix.
    (1)

  6. #6
    Player
    XaarKrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    16
    Character
    Xaar Krey
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Machinist Lv 90
    I'm unsure why they couldn't have just revamped the old system to:

    -sale prices don't apply to gift purchases
    Or
    -gift codes expire after 10 days (to kill resale market of items purchased on sale)
    And
    -redo the gift code generator to track the transaction via the gift code
    (2)

  7. #7
    Player
    Avoidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    1,314
    Character
    Chadhadai Oronir
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 83
    Imagine doing this around the holidays, lmao
    SE is so hard to read, I swear to god. Sometimes they'll cut down on the cash shop features or straight up stop selling the game and cite the game's long term health as a reason for it. And then other times in the middle of a content drought they'll release a mount or something in the cash shop and charge like 30 dollars for it instead of just implementing it into the game as content, or they'll put out some bugged outfit for 22 dollars, etc.

    Basically sometimes it feels like they hate money, but other times it feels like they're milking this game and its player base's good will like an endless cash cow. I genuinely can't figure them out. Imagine having this problem for years but picking the holidays to decide to finally do something about it, and then the solution doesn't even stop the RMTers (and you recognize and acknowledge this) lol.

    On another note, banning the bots/RMTers won't do anything. They just make a new account that stays active for months and generates loads of profit. You've gotta go after the customers, because they have way more to lose and can't gain it back easily since they'd rather pay others to cheat for them than cheat directly themselves. Once potential buyers see that there's an actual risk involved, they'll stop buying and the revenue for RMT-folk dries up. No idea why they focus on banning one side of the RMT chain but not the other.
    (3)

  8. #8
    Player
    CallumSuperfloof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    2
    Character
    Callum Superfloof
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90

    Merry Christmas

    And you do this right before Christmas? Do you have any idea how much this hurts your loyal players? I myself have gifted and been gifted multiple items in the "Mount, Minion, Emote" realm because those are the most popular.

    This is a foolish decision based on NOTHING proven. This will do absolutely nothing to stop them. They always find a way around this in no time, thus all you are doing with this is hurting your loyal players and making us angry.
    (1)

  9. #9
    Player
    Gember's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    214
    Character
    Snow Fox
    World
    Zurvan
    Main Class
    Fisher Lv 58
    There is a post on twitter by Lady Xhiel White, or @Miss_Xhiel . She made a post regarding why such actions were taken, and its related back with SE giving out the update for everyone to update their passwords due to breaches. Its EXACTLY about that, and the fact that doing ton of purchases revokes will get the companies processing said transactions to ban the company for having these problems.


    I honestly recommend anyone who is curious to look it up and read it. (Its 15 tweets.) Its all legal stuff; and I think it'll help with some confusion. I don't like how things are happening, but it is what it is.
    (6)

Tags for this Thread