Of course knowing the future to its specifics is impossible, but all living beings have to make judgment calls and inferences based on existing information. How convenient that its not acceptable to do so here.
Fuck no, but the issue I have with the world isn't that people are making decisions that effect others, its the decisions and the reasons for them. Even in the democratic societies people are making decisions for others, oftentimes ones they don't agree with. Unless you believe in anarchism Crowny, which is fine if you do, thats an inevitability.
You want a discussion or not Crowny. I'm answering your questions and responding to your points.
D All strife and sorrow? No.
You've treated me like an idiot and denigrated me throughout this discussion, so don't get sanctimonious with me.
We almost certainly can!
Sounds real familiar to me!Beyond that distant veil... Paradise lost. So glorious. So beautiful...
We were a proud and noble race. Strength embodied. We knew only love. Before they came...
Metal monstrosities of black and silver. No bonds of blood did they share, nor conviction did they have to guide them.
A crushing defeat. Never had we known such shame... Stilled now are the winds, though none could fill these wings burdened by ignominy. We fly no more, only sink into oblivion...
I beg thee leave me to dream. To forget that which we have lost...
Sure, but that perfection was still sought with a single minded zealotry that peace and unity was the way forward. A zealotry that gave rise to the machines that killed them and the war that ripped their planet apart. Each and every world we are shown follows that same pattern. The yearning for a perfect world, the manifestation of that in action, and the consequences that follow. If you wish to hold that Meteion find all these exceptions that were so definitely possible paths forward, and simply decided to torment Hermes for the fun of it, then by all means. I think that's crazy.
And I am repeatedly going to point out that the story gives several direct quotes where major characters state that it is impossible to do that. How do you hold the story states #2 with those quotes? You've yet to answer that, and instead insisted that the contradiction remains. The premise of the Plenty isn't undermined by pointing out that its denizens were wrong anymore than the premise of the dragons, or the Ea or the Omicron is wrong because of what happened in Ultima Thule. A society that gave up individuality itself in order to eliminate sorrow being ruined by the realization that life is unable to exist with out is not crazy, it makes perfect sense!
Believe as you please then. I think they tried their best.
Ok, then in the interest of discussion explain your reasoning. You've given a moral reason for why you shouldn't by saying:
But I don't agree with you there! So were at an impasse. If we would like to discuss that and not just agree to disagree, we then need to find a way around that. What reason do I have to not believe that? What problems exist in my reasoning here? Any of these would give me more to say than just restating my position!It's not a "hard call" at all. No one deserves to make unilateral decisions for an entire planet.
Ok, I genuinely don't understand how a statement where it is clearly stated that highly sensitive affairs that are revealed only to select few, which he states includes us, can be interpreted this way. The word include quite literally means "comprise or contain as part of a whole." What exactly do you think the whole being referred to is?
Good one Brinne, I'm sure you know for complete certainty that I've never advocated, agreed with or fought for change in production practices in worldwide supply chains. You mentioned me poisoning the well before but based on statements like this I don't think its a well anymore. Its a container of toxic sludge.