Results 1 to 10 of 9557

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player KizuyaKatogami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    3,472
    Character
    Kizuya Katogami
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 81
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunaxia View Post
    Sometimes I fancy myself knowledgable about FFXIV lore, and then something like this comes along and puts me to shame. I really wish they'd make more of the dedicated world-building visible in the game. Perhaps with this new Codex we have now? I really enjoyed the Field Notes from Bozja, and I think the rest of the game could more than benefit from something similar.



    It kind of is a non-issue because the people responsible for those things are no longer here today, so they're not really relevant. I feel we're in a bit of a circular argument where you're saying "look what happens in Eorzea!" and I'm answering that whatever may be happening there has been perpetuated by Garlemald on a much wider, more deliberate and more devastating scale, to which you're responding "but the Eorzeans do it too!" No one is claiming the city states are perfect; their problems have featured prominently in the storyline, and not without some condemnation from the Scions themselves. But this argument of Garlemald being backed into a corner and "making do with what they had" to justify atrocities they committed just doesn't work, and it hasn't done since they progressed from a nation seeking survival to a nation devoted to conquest.
    Yes, and again, its easy to remedy those situations when you literally have a demi-god character who helps solve all of your problems.Whereas with Garlemald they were raised where you either grow strong and defend yourself or someone will come and take everything you hold dear. The city states dont have to worry about that anymore because guess what? anyone who disagrees with them points us at them and asks us to kill them. In the end though i guess it all comes back to Venat. Lets all thank her for creating the wonderful world of war,rape,and illness. Because its just so much better than the unsundered world.
    (5)

  2. #2
    Player
    CrownySuccubus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    655
    Character
    Victoria Crowny
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami View Post
    Yes, and again, its easy to remedy those situations when you literally have a demi-god character who helps solve all of your problems.Whereas with Garlemald they were raised where you either grow strong and defend yourself or someone will come and take everything you hold dear. The city states dont have to worry about that anymore because guess what? anyone who disagrees with them points us at them and asks us to kill them..
    So then I guess in the end, Garlemald got exactly what they wanted. You can't advocate a "live by the sword, die by the sword" philosophy and then cry foul when it's YOU that does the dying. Garlemald did what they wanted to do: wage war and rule by strength at all costs, even against their fellow Garleans.

    Yeah, Garlemald didn't have the unstoppable super soldier to save the day, but not for lack of trying. Hell, Zenos was actually better than the WOL for most of the plot. But...whoops it turned out that he cared more about war than ruling, too.
    (5)

  3. #3
    Player
    Lunaxia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,217
    Character
    Ashe Sinclair
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by aveyond-dreams View Post
    Perhaps because one is more intelligent and less preachy than the other? Larsa's ultimate goal was peace. Not regime change. Instead of toppling enemy leaders left and right he worked together with people like Princess Ashe, both of which later became leaders of their respective nations. It made for a far more palatable story than having nation after nation bend over backwards in order to conform to real world ideals - for which Alphinaud is the mouthpiece.
    What enemy leaders has he toppled and regime changes is he supposed to have enforced? Alphinaud has only ever acted as a diplomat between nations/ peoples similarly in the name of peace. They're near enough the same sort of character to me so I'm honestly struggling to understand it.

    Quote Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami View Post
    Yes, and again, its easy to remedy those situations when you literally have a demi-god character who helps solve all of your problems.Whereas with Garlemald they were raised where you either grow strong and defend yourself or someone will come and take everything you hold dear. The city states dont have to worry about that anymore because guess what? anyone who disagrees with them points us at them and asks us to kill them. In the end though i guess it all comes back to Venat. Lets all thank her for creating the wonderful world of war,rape,and illness. Because its just so much better than the unsundered world.
    I mean, "what state would the world be in without the WoL?" is a valid and interesting subject to discuss, but that doesn't change the fact that Garlemald would still be doing those things. You can't equate war crimes with societal flaws regardless of whether the WoL has influenced the city states towards better paths or not.
    (6)

  4. #4
    Player KizuyaKatogami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    3,472
    Character
    Kizuya Katogami
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 81
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunaxia View Post
    What enemy leaders has he toppled and regime changes is he supposed to have enforced? Alphinaud has only ever acted as a diplomat between nations/ peoples similarly in the name of peace. They're near enough the same sort of character to me so I'm honestly struggling to understand it.



    I mean, "what state would the world be in without the WoL?" is a valid and interesting subject to discuss, but that doesn't change the fact that Garlemald would still be doing those things. You can't equate war crimes with societal flaws regardless of whether the WoL has influenced the city states towards better paths or not.
    I mean, i can and i did. In the end everywhere sucks in 14. It's just who got lucky to have the super speshul character on their side. In the end it was the city states. The garleans got the short end of the stick and were manipulated from the start. Again, blame Venat not them.
    (7)

  5. #5
    Player
    MikkoAkure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    2,188
    Character
    Midi Ajihri
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by CrownySuccubus View Post
    So then I guess in the end, Garlemald got exactly what they wanted. You can't advocate a "live by the sword, die by the sword" philosophy and then cry foul when it's YOU that does the dying. Garlemald did what they wanted to do: wage war and rule by strength at all costs, even against their fellow Garleans.

    Yeah, Garlemald didn't have the unstoppable super soldier to save the day, but not for lack of trying. Hell, Zenos was actually better than the WOL for most of the plot. But...whoops it turned out that he cared more about war than ruling, too.
    Looking back on things, up until the end, the Garleans always had someone as strong or stronger than the WoL but still lost.

    Nael was backed by a demi-god and beat us down in cutscenes until we ended up defeating her but she still succeeded in bringing her god to life and destroyed a whole continent.

    Gaius was pretty evenly matched with the WoL, beat the crap out of the Scions in his 1.0 introduction cutscene, and it took Hydaelyn wasting almost all of her energy she had left in order for us to beat him. Under Solus, he was the Garlean's WoL equivalent who conquered multiple city-states and brutally put down the first rebellion in Rabanastre.

    Zenos was much stronger than the WoL and had multiple opportunities to kill us but didn't because he's an insane person. Under Varis, he was also the Empire's fix-it guy like the WoL and went to Ala Mhigo and Doma to put down rebellions much like Gaius. If he was actually competent, didn't kill his own officers, didn't purposefully create rebellions in order to fight strong people, killed us when he had the chance, and wasn't an Ascian puppet like his predecessors, we would have had a different story.


    Garlemald didn't lack for extremely strong individuals. They just didn't have the protagonist on their side and were written to be the bad guys.


    Our character and the players' first experience with the Garlean Empire is with the Garlean-generated Calamity and multiple invasions as well as killing a bunch of our NPC friends. Being threatened with death the whole game, having no interaction at all with normal Garleans besides their soldiers who are doing the aforementioned death threatening, and siding with the shadowy, scheming ghosts who laugh maniacally and talk about resurrecting their dark god while also teaching antagonistic tribes to summon their own gods which gave the Garleans "reason" to invade in the first place doesn't exactly make one want to help you. It's difficult to sympathize with a bully no matter how tragic their backstory is and especially less so when that tragic backstory happened 600 years ago.

    But WoL and the Eorzean Alliance still came in and decided to help the Garlean survivors out of the destruction of their own making after they were defanged and weren't in a position to do anything anymore.
    (3)