You may want to look a bit deeper then the first post because the discussion has evolved a lot since then...as most topics that are 400+ pages long tend to. What started off as a topic people were initially dismissing as bait from the relative shallowness of the initial post gradually drew in others who had more valid and better explained issues with the storytelling.
Though I'll still go into specifics with the last bit because one of the core problems people have with Venat throughout this very long (And admittedly at times repetitive) discussion is that there's no indication she told the Convocation anything about the Final Days whatsoever. To them, she was just a deviant who opposed the revival of those sacrificed to Zodiark for reasons they dismissed as simple fear when history could've played out very differently if they had known the truth before calamity struck.
It was also made pretty clear that Etheriys was never a "perfect" world begin with, nor was there any indication the Ancients were trying to completely eliminate strife in the manner the people of Plenty seem to have succeeded at doing (Though judging from the barren broken husk of their star below it came at a terrible cost). Creation magic in itself was a catalyst for that, with unruly creations routinely needing to be either put down or contained in Pandemonium. Even Elidibus admits that their people often stood divided on matters, but it seldom lasted for long until the matter of Zodiark's sacrifices came into play.



引用して返信



