
Originally Posted by
Lauront
The lore EW presents on memory is unfortunately not particularly clear, especially as Montichaigne who articulates it is discussing two different theories of the soul, i.e. one whereby it's dissolved and re-assimilated in the Aetherial Sea so that new souls can be born, and the other focusing on what actually happens in the setting, i.e. soul rebirth (by all accounts, the correct theory, and G'raha takes it a notch further by positing that souls have intrinsic behavioural propensities.) On the one and, he states memory aether is not very susceptible to change; on the other, he says some events can imprint on the soul indelibly. I don't think he is presenting too certain an understanding of it, and my suspicion is that which theory you subscribe to has implications for what you believe happens to memory aether. Amon himself notes that he always had dreams of his times in Elpis, which he blames on Hermes's attempt to suppress his memory having the opposite effect on the memories. Text on the Convocation crystals varies between EN and FR, in that the latter states they're intended to revive memories. Equally, throughout the Eden quests, both the notion of imbuing and reviving memory are brought up, and by all accounts, the crystals are preferable as a method to what Mitron uses, i.e. the Ascian prime merger. IMO, it is plausible that germinating the seeds of a few imbued memories will suffice to begin restoring further memories, particularly as the subconscious reflects on them and tries to establish context... it may just be a case of how deeply buried in the soul they are. Either way, the lore here is more a case of just-so stories than firmly established and detailed fact, so I think both interpretations are valid.