
The problem with this is that it is an opt-in sample, which fundamentally biases the data.Definitely still easily flawed data but I just I want add in statistics you can very successfully extrapolate info from very small subsets. Of course the more data the better, especially if there was an unforeseen flaw, but you can see something like 1% accurately predict 99%. Surprisingly small samples can be used for exceptionally accurate results. Then again given the nature of the -insert anywhere- places of feedback... it does obviously move about the data. People for example are more likely to come here if they have something they want to change rather than something they want to praise. This is where someone would make a mistake if they just blindly followed feedback, but if the players can accurately articulate why they want given feedback I believe some of the consequences of listening to a small portion of the community can be alleviated.
You need a truly random sample to do any sort of meaningful extrapolation from small sample sizes - which sadly is not the case for the forums.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

