Quote Originally Posted by Jaquan View Post
So wait we'd never improve without those tools? I'm getting confused. I was lead to believe the content was designed to be beaten without a single third party tool and that includes ACT. Yet here you are telling me that players as a collective would never reach a level of doing so without analytical tools that let them pinpoint basically everything much faster than we'd do it without them? Is that how entire getting better process look like? Check the numbers, throw the log into analytical tool and do what it suggests? Now I question if I even want to reach that level

As of ACT wasn't one level of outrage coming from the fact that World First group used automatic call-out they programmed into their software?
To answer your first paragraph: Yes it does.

To answer your second: ACT and Cactbot are not the same. You can have ACT without Cactbot. I can understand the outrage over that but at the end of the day, all that it is is accurate callouts. It shouldn't be used in world first races for sure, but outside of that I don't see it being a problem as it usually benefits the entire party via the caller.

Last, since you brought this up, do you personally read through the entire log after a fight and crunch those numbers?