Tale of Emet [FF14 x Nier Reincarnation event story]

[EaraGrace]

I don't think that's Emet's description, I think it's the description of an omniscient third-party narrator.

I don’t think the narrator is completely separated from Emets view though. She even says in regards to the Sundering that “Such an outcome is unbearable.” The other uses of the words “malformed,” and “pitiful” are more than descriptors. If this story was written from Venats perspective you likely see words like “resilient” or “imperfect,” because quite simply she would interpret the situation differently. Which kind of calls into question whether the narrator is objective right?

When you look at the narration in part 2, I would hardly call something like "At last, the Light of the future - The bright god emerges victorious" to be from Emet's perspective. Similarly the "Unnngh... Aaah..." is something we actually hear, quoted, and the twisted forms of their souls is something we actually see. I also don't understand why you think he'd be able to understand them with the Echo, or why the sundering of their souls would have no negative repercussions and be non-damaging. Again, Krile can't understand animals, and these people have effectively been reduced to the same state.

I don’t think that Emet would disagree with that line, in fact I think he said something similar in Raktika but I’d have to find the quote. And once again those malformed souls we see are later human like with no indication that it’s a different scene. Everyone there is in the same pose, in the same places, with no mention that the souls themselves were repaired or becoming more formed. In one of the battles you see human-esque entities with big sundering symbols all over, clearly meant to imply their Sundered Humans, but it’s obvious that isn’t what they actually look like since… we’ll we know what the Sundered look like.

And while Krile can’t understand animals we can, so long as they’re intelligent (and even to a certain extent when they are not). Given those Sundered beings are us and we aren’t any less intelligent than the Ancients (imo) I think they could be understood by someone with the echo.

[Veloran]

I don’t think that Emet would disagree with that line, in fact I think he said something similar in Raktika but I’d have to find the quote.

In Rak'tika Emet describes Zodiark with terms like "His grace", "A savior mighty and magnificent", and Hydaelyn as just "Hydaelyn" or very derisively as "your Mother". Hardly descriptors like "dark god", "dark deity", or "brighter god" and "the Light of the future". In particular here the narrator, when speaking, describes Zodiark in almost ominous tones but Hydaelyn in almost reverent tones. None of this really matches with an Emet perspective.

And once again those malformed souls we see are later human like with no indication that it’s a different scene.

Between the two slides showing them going from twisted and malformed to more fully shaped, the narrator literally says "Decades, centuries, millennia pass. As he works tirelessly, the wretched creatures begin to learn. They speak in new tongues, worship new gods, and forge new histories." We're jumping thousands of years between that shift, I don't really see how it can be said that there is "no indication" that the scene is changing.

In one of the battles you see human-esque entities with big sundering symbols all over, clearly meant to imply their Sundered Humans,

What are you referring to?

And while Krile can’t understand animals we can, so long as they’re intelligent

There are instances where WoL can seem to "understand" animals, but I think the game usually makes it clear that this is simply due to a lot of experience and intuition, not the Echo.

Given those Sundered beings are us and we aren’t any less intelligent than the Ancients (imo) I think they could be understood by someone with the echo.

The sundered then and the sundered now are probably nowhere near equivalent. I mean Emet outright says that intelligence and physicality is halved with each sundering, I don't see how the full 13/14ths sundering could possibly leave them with anything similar in terms of intellect and physicality, as this very narrative seems to outline.

[EaraGrace]

In Rak'tika Emet describes Zodiark with terms like "His grace", "A savior mighty and magnificent", and Hydaelyn as just "Hydaelyn" or very derisively as "your Mother". Hardly descriptors like "dark god", "dark deity", or "brighter god" and "the Light of the future". In particular here the narrator, when speaking, describes Zodiark in almost ominous tones but Hydaelyn in almost reverent tones. None of this really matches with an Emet perspective.

I still think that would fit with Emet, in the optional dialogue he seems to speak of Zodiark similarly.

Emet-Selch: And like one of your primals, He tempered us. It was only natural. There is no resisting such power. And so we Ascians came to exist solely to bring about the rule of darkness. His darkness. Of course, some would call us "evil" for it... and they would be fools. Though that is only to be expected, given their innate ability to conceive of the nature of our universe.

My point more generally though is that the narrator should not be taken at her word, as she’s describing Emets view and tale. Even if she were to be out of synch with him in certain moments I don’t think I’d buy her statements as fact, even if they swung in the other direction. The fact she calls them “wretched creatures” I think seals the deal for me.

Between the two slides showing them going from twisted and malformed to more fully shaped, the narrator literally says "Decades, centuries, millennia pass. As he works tirelessly, the wretched creatures begin to learn. They speak in new tongues, worship new gods, and forge new histories." We're jumping thousands of years between that shift, I don't really see how it can be said that there is "no indication" that the scene is changing.

Because nothing is changing about the scene, the only difference is the souls. The poses and positions are the exact same. And once again Emet is very clear that he still views them as malformed “half men” even after millennia pass. If his feeling that they were abominations was purely because of the initial effects that were visible after the Sundering, then those wouldn’t be valid to use on us or Varis right?

What are you referring to?

Around 15:45 in this video

https://youtu.be/fGm29ROnFlk

There are instances where WoL can seem to "understand" animals, but I think the game usually makes it clear that this is simply due to a lot of experience and intuition, not the Echo.

I’m referring to the lost little troll sidequest, where we communicate with a small troll who only Grrrs. The echo allows us to understand him perfectly.

The sundered then and the sundered now are probably nowhere near equivalent. I mean Emet outright says that intelligence and physicality is halved with each sundering, I don't see how the full 13/14ths sundering could possibly leave them with anything similar in terms of intellect and physicality, as this very narrative seems to outline.

Ardbert and co. seemed just as smart as us, same with all the people we met on the First.

[KizuyaKatogami]

I have to say i find it a bit ironic that people talk about Emet lying or having a biased view meanwhile these same people are the ones who 100% trust venat/hydaelyn despite her lying and manipulating us far more and take her pity walk scene at face value without questioning it’s authenticity. Double standards i suppose…

[Iscah]

He also says that in addition to the soul, a single sundering would half both strength and intelligence. The full sundering would have left people with - at most, depending on the exact method - 1/14th their original intellect and physical strength. So even if, in that example, both Rynes looked the same with his projection, in reality they would both be half what they were previously in every way.

1/14th the physical strength and I doubt any Ancient would even be capable of standing and moving around with those huge bodies of theirs. They probably all just died of exposure on the spot, if their organs were even capable of functioning and pumping blood and oxygen throughout their forms at that point.

If you're going to get "sciency" about it, then you can't simultaneously have Ryne splitting into two visually identical entities (logically must be halved in density to remain the same size) and be concerned that the ancients would not be able to support their bodies with 1/14 of their strength. If strength is reduced and weight reduced to match, then – setting aside the properly sciency technicalities of how such things interact at different proportions – there is no issue. Their altered strength matches their altered bodies and all is even.

Or to look at it another way, if they all collapsed under their own weight and died immediately, the modern races cannot be descended from them.

Of course, you literally cannot halve "everything" about a person, numbers-wise. Halving the height of something while keeping the same proportions brings it down to an eighth of its volume. So there's a degree of ambiguity in exactly what would be reduced and by how much.

I have wondered in the past, but haven't fully investigated, if the relative size of human and ancient might work out to them being 14 times the volume – that would add up if the ancients are a little under 2.5 x the height of a human, which from memory sounds about right.

In Rak'tika Emet describes Zodiark with terms like "His grace", "A savior mighty and magnificent", and Hydaelyn as just "Hydaelyn" or very derisively as "your Mother". Hardly descriptors like "dark god", "dark deity", or "brighter god" and "the Light of the future".

Actually, there's at least one example of Emet using "dark" in the same positive connotation that we would normally use light/bright – specifically from the Dying Gasp: "dream now of a dark tomorrow" to mean a hopeful one for the ancients.

I have to say i find it a bit ironic that people talk about Emet lying or having a biased view meanwhile these same people are the ones who 100% trust venat/hydaelyn despite her lying and manipulating us far more and take her pity walk scene at face value without questioning it’s authenticity. Double standards i suppose…

I had a lot of trust for Hydaelyn and how Hydaelyn was presented to us, because I thought to invert it at such a late stage would be poor storytelling.

Even at late post-Shadowbringers, she seemed to be a primal designed to act as a mother-goddess, and it was conceivable that the narrative was designed to maintain her as ultimately "good" and the Sundering some kind of accident, A.I. logic failure or urgently needed as the lesser of two evils.

Quite frankly, the writers failed to take any of these paths, diminished Hydaelyn from being something "bigger than us" to just a single person putting on an act, and gave her a motive that... well, aligns with what the game presents as thematically good, but rings hollow to me.

I'm not questioning this narrative of Emet's because I support Venat; I'm questioning it because it contradicts what Emet himself told us in the game.

[Veloran]

If you're going to get "sciency" about it, then you can't simultaneously have Ryne splitting into two visually identical entities (logically must be halved in density to remain the same size) and be concerned that the ancients would not be able to support their bodies with 1/14 of their strength. If strength is reduced and weight reduced to match, then – setting aside the properly sciency technicalities of how such things interact at different proportions – there is no issue. Their altered strength matches their altered bodies and all is even.

Or to look at it another way, if they all collapsed under their own weight and died immediately, the modern races cannot be descended from them.

Of course, you literally cannot halve "everything" about a person, numbers-wise. Halving the height of something while keeping the same proportions brings it down to an eighth of its volume. So there's a degree of ambiguity in exactly what would be reduced and by how much.

I have wondered in the past, but haven't fully investigated, if the relative size of human and ancient might work out to them being 14 times the volume – that would add up if the ancients are a little under 2.5 x the height of a human, which from memory sounds about right.

Who knows the exact ratio of how aetherial density translates to physical density. Frankly I think it's obvious that the writers didn't really think this one through, and to coherently rationalize everything would either require a very convoluted explanation or some very diligent handwaving. But the fact is, we are told outright that their intelligence and physicality was reduced in proportion to how sundered people were, and what we see from this narrative supports this notion. This at least is one detail they're relatively consistent on, probably because Ishikawa herself wrote it.

[Veloran]

I still think that would fit with Emet, in the optional dialogue he seems to speak of Zodiark similarly.

I don't see that as being similar at all, in that dialog he's merely stating Zodiark's elemental alignment. A far cry from something like calling Hydaelyn "the Light of the future".

My point more generally though is that the narrator should not be taken at her word, as she’s describing Emets view and tale. Even if she were to be out of synch with him in certain moments I don’t think I’d buy her statements as fact, even if they swung in the other direction. The fact she calls them “wretched creatures” I think seals the deal for me.

Why? They are wretched. They've literally been devolved into shambling animals.

Because nothing is changing about the scene, the only difference is the souls. The poses and positions are the exact same. And once again Emet is very clear that he still views them as malformed “half men” even after millennia pass. If his feeling that they were abominations was purely because of the initial effects that were visible after the Sundering, then those wouldn’t be valid to use on us or Varis right?

"Same scene slightly changed" is a very commonplace cinematic technique. The point is juxtaposition of elements in a timelapse, which is particularly evocative when you have a central figure that remains the same. This is literally a slideshow, they're doing their best here. The point is that even as mankind began to improve, Emet retained his impression of them as misbegotten creatures.

Around 15:45 in this video

That is what Zodiark, Hydaelyn's actual target, ended up as. Could be the whole "torn apart" aesthetic is what happened to everyone's souls at first, but over time they healed and coalesced into more stable forms. This sort of thing would explain the similarity between shards as we have seen them now, in fact.

I’m referring to the lost little troll sidequest, where we communicate with a small troll who only Grrrs. The echo allows us to understand him perfectly.

You mean the troll that is as intelligent as any human, way more than other trolls, to the point that it can not only understand human speech but can also read? I'm pretty sure this is a case of the exception proving the rule.

Ardbert and co. seemed just as smart as us, same with all the people we met on the First.

We don't really know what proportion of aetherial density each shard ended up with, or how the souls of the people on each shard may have changed over time.

[EaraGrace]

I don't see that as being similar at all, in that dialog he's merely stating Zodiark's elemental alignment. A far cry from something like calling Hydaelyn "the Light of the future".

Ok so if we’re going with her being objective then you’d agree that Hydaelyn is the light of the future then?

Why? They are wretched. They've literally been devolved into shambling animals.

They’re human and even when they were incapable of speech they remained so. Through the calamity of wind, lightning, fire, earth, ice, water and darkness they remained so. Being “unable to from words” due to losing language, culture and knowledge doesn’t mean they lack the intelligence to do so and it certainly doesn’t make them “shambling animals.”

"Same scene slightly changed" is a very commonplace cinematic technique. The point is juxtaposition of elements in a timelapse, which is particularly evocative when you have a central figure that remains the same. This is literally a slideshow, they're doing their best here. The point is that even as mankind began to improve, Emet retained his impression of them as misbegotten creatures.

Which should say everything about why taking him at face value is foolhardy. The man himself wouldn’t defend those statements at this stage, however deeply he still thinks his beliefs “inviolable.”

That is what Zodiark, Hydaelyn's actual target, ended up as. Could be the whole "torn apart" aesthetic is what happened to everyone's souls at first, but over time they healed and coalesced into more stable forms. This sort of thing would explain the similarity between shards as we have seen them now, in fact.

My point is this is a tale from Emets pov, and the fact that there are discrepancies should provoke questions. I would’ve thought this would be something we can all agree on, given how discrepancies are used to dismiss the cutscene at the end of Elpis.

You mean the troll that is as intelligent as any human, way more than other trolls, to the point that it can not only understand human speech but can also read? I'm pretty sure this is a case of the exception proving the rule.

Yes I do mean that troll. That troll proves as long as a being is capable of intelligent thought it can be understood with the echo, even if what physically comes out is gibberish. Much like the Sundered described in the event. I have no reason to think that if Emet sat down with the Sundered and tried to teach them their letters he wouldn’t be just as a successful as he would be teaching the troll.

We don't really know what proportion of aetherial density each shard ended up with, or how the souls of the people on each shard may have changed over time.

There’s nothing to suggest the shards had an imbalance of aetheric density. The only one with more would be the Source post a Rejoining.

[DreadCrow]

Another in-game counterpoint to this "literal malformed creatures" thing is Emet's own demonstration of the Sundering with Ryne. He produces a perfect copy of her, not a devolved blob – which surely would have been the quickest way to impart the sheer horror of what he had been through, if it is indeed what he had been through.

I'm inclined to take it as unreliable narrator plus writing to convey in broad strokes for a non-FF audience plus possibly Ishikawa not checking the finer points of what the Echo can do, because that entire thing has been out the window for some time.

The rules of what is the Echo and what is the blessing of Light got completely flipped sometime between being laid out in 2.X/3.0 and revisited in 5.X/6.0, and the lorebook descriptions are from that earlier era so I really don't know how much of it we can trust any more. We direly need a third lorebook to hammer all this out.




That's an interesting way of looking at it too. If Emet, consciously or subconsciously, recoils from these sundered beings and refuses to see them as something he still can relate to, he can't connect to them and so reinforces his impression that they are in a worse state than they actually are.

I think a lot of people don't want to admit that Emet... Well, he's sort of a racial supremacist. Shadowbringers is pretty obvious about it, with how much disdain he has for the Sundered, despite recognizing they are sapient beings. And even the subtext states this; he was directly responsible for Garlemald, who think Eorzea is full of "savages" and genuinely thinks genocide of the various tribal is entirely acceptable.

I have to say i find it a bit ironic that people talk about Emet lying or having a biased view meanwhile these same people are the ones who 100% trust venat/hydaelyn despite her lying and manipulating us far more and take her pity walk scene at face value without questioning it’s authenticity. Double standards i suppose…

In the absolute worst possible interruption of what Venat did, she planetary genocide. Once. But that "genocide" birthed fourteen new worlds, each filled with sapient lifeforms. As in beings that were able to form cultures, create art, from languages.., Even if we take Emet at is word that he nudged them in that direction and believe that it wouldn't have developed without his help. And she only did it because if she didn't, the world would have literally be extinguished of all life.

Now let's consider Emet's actions. He also committed planetary genocide. Eight times. Seven of those lead to an apocalyptic event on the Source which ended many more lives. He also created two brutally oppressive empires and while we don't know everything about the Allagans, Garlemald is built on a doctrine of racial supremacy. And he had nothing but contempt for the Sundered, finding them inferior beings, even another Unsundered was outplayed an inferior being.

You can make the argument that Venat is bad. But Emet is much, much worse on every measurable level.

[Lurina]

In the absolute worst possible interruption of what Venat did, she planetary genocide. Once.

No offense to you personally - I get the point you were trying to make - but this quote might be peak FFXIV Lore Forums.