What are alternative healing options you want to see on a new healer class?

[krislox]

What happened? What did they do so wrong that they got kicked?

[Recon1o6]

What happened? What did they do so wrong that they got kicked?

The healer tester was kicked out for being "too good" when literally all they did was start looking at normal/alliance raids on healer and the odd extreme. You know, content that any healer will do after completing the dungeons which is the lowest level of difficulty. The healer tester was not even a healer main to "simulate casual and new player's experience of a dungeon"

Meanwhile, yoshida himself was in the test team, a black mage who is at a high enough level to do ultimates, testing on the job he's best at. In the same team.


As for your original question, they absolutely bloody could make a 5th healer. In cased you missed the memo, the "regen/barrier split" is nonexistant. All healers have regens and shields and content is not designed for either given how little of it actually requires healers so not only does it fail its purpose but the healer role is redundant currently.

If they put some effort into healers we'd have 4 unique healers and still have room for a 5th instead of 1 with a few tweaks and called separate jobs. And we'd have damage that requires us to be present in all content

[Rein_eon_Osborne]

What happened? What did they do so wrong that they got kicked?

Apologies for the half-troll and half-joke from my side. Sebazy & Recon answered it for you.

Now jokes aside... I'd love to see a healer:

• That are not magical by nature.
• Healers that heals by marking/cursing their target so that players who attack them leeches off HP to recover.
• A healer that's not just all about white, light, and pretty sparkles.

Or the good ol' response: I'd rather them improve what we already have because when managing 3 healers was already disastrous, I don't think I want to trust them with 2 extra.