Why are we allowing sprouts to bid on houses at all

[forsakee]

If you can only own two houses (1 personal 1 FC) per account, then by extension you cannot own any more than that, same DC or otherwise.

I'm aware of the definition of the word, how would it be implemented in game? How are you deciding who loses a house and how it is removed if it's not already prohibited by the system in place?
If it's automatic, then why not just prohibit them from buying the plot in the first place?

You know those people that own 10+ house? Simple link houses to accounts then make them choose 2 houses to keep and confiscate the rest and reimburse some gill.

There are people that own entire wards that is mindblowing! how was it ever allowed in the first place/

[Seraphor]

You know those people that own 10+ house? Simple link houses to accounts then make them choose 2 houses to keep and confiscate the rest and reimburse some gill.

People with 10+ houses were grandfathered in. It was not against the rules to buy multiple houses when they bought them.
Retroactively policing changed rules is a very slippery slope.

[forsakee]

People with 10+ houses were grandfathered in. It was not against the rules to buy multiple houses when they bought them.
Retroactively policing changed rules is a very slippery slope.

Yep that sounds idiotic.... lets keep rules from when the game had 1/10th the population and while people are constantly bitching about not being able to experience specific content because of greedy individuals. Especially when Square is having enough server issues on their own, I'd be fine with people owning 10+ houses if there was 10 times the opportunity. Sadly they have limited space which effects the whole playerbase

[Seraphor]

Yep that sounds idiotic.... lets keep rules from when the game had 1/10th the population and while people are constantly bitching about not being able to experience specific content because of greedy individuals.

Like it or not those are the rules.
Those people still have to log in and use all of those houses every 30 days to keep them.

How would you like it if they later decided you had to Captain rank in your GC to own a house, but you bought yours when you were just a 2nd Lieutenant, and so they retroactively removed your house?

[AmpelioB]

Like it or not those are the rules.
Those people still have to log in and use all of those houses every 30 days to keep them.

How would you like it if they later decided you had to Captain rank in your GC to own a house, but you bought yours when you were just a 2nd Lieutenant, and so they retroactively removed your house?

WOW IT'S NOT LIKE!!! SE CAN CHANGE THE RULES!! THE SAME RULES THAT THEY, THEMSELVES CREATED!!!! MINDBLOWING!!! ������

[Seraphor]

WOW IT'S NOT LIKE!!! SE CAN CHANGE THE RULES!! THE SAME RULES THAT THEY, THEMSELVES CREATED!!!! MINDBLOWING!!! ������

I think you need to calm down.

[forsakee]

WOW IT'S NOT LIKE!!! SE CAN CHANGE THE RULES!! THE SAME RULES THAT THEY, THEMSELVES CREATED!!!! MINDBLOWING!!! ������

I think you need to calm down.

I feel like that was an accurate response

[Padudu]

WOW IT'S NOT LIKE!!! SE CAN CHANGE THE RULES!! THE SAME RULES THAT THEY, THEMSELVES CREATED!!!! MINDBLOWING!!! ������

ok i know it's sarcasm lmao but did you try to use emojis

also SE put themselves in this corner and keeps insisting we be in this corner LMAO idk how people can be content with bandaids upon bandaid fixes for this stupid system

[AmpelioB]

ok i know it's sarcasm lmao but did you try to use emojis

Yes, especifically the mindblow emoji

also SE put themselves in this corner and keeps insisting we be in this corner LMAO idk how people can be content with bandaids upon bandaid fixes for this stupid system

Yea, honestly I already owned a house and after being content with decorating it, it stopped being fun, then I stopped wanting to play the game and I couldn't because i had a house eventually I just let go and to this day I think that people that pay sub only to have the house are nuts.