Quote Originally Posted by SturmChurro View Post
It did feel rushed, but Garlemald really got the short end of the stick. A lot of players seem to have this sort of phobia or hatred of the Garleans in general, especially in areas like twitter, so they were probably the easiest to just cut and get rid of.
I am not disagreeing with you.
But if Garlemald really was so unpopular I understand why SE cut them short. In addition to the ressource problem. A shame, yes, but understandable to a degree because a story that focusses on unpopular characters or, in that case nations, is not adding anything to the longevity of the game. Let's just hope they do not cut short more plots in the future because that would hurt the game in the long run as well.