Just one important point about this. During the Live Letter, Yoshida specifically said that this latter part was not the lore reason, but only his own personal speculation. So the part about growing bigger ears due to being hard of hearing, or Lalafells being small because they were under pressure, were basically joke answers and shouldn't be taken seriously (unless it actually gets written into the lore, but this was just Yoshida spitballing at the end). The fact that the player races are descended from Sundered Ancients didn't get this disclaimer though, so we can assume that part to be as canon as we get for now.
Also regarding this:
Yoshida clarified that because she was at the limit of her power, she couldn't truly control the result, so she did her attack with the assumption that Emet-Selch could survive it rather than any kind of guarantee. Lahabrea and Elidibus happened to be with Emet-Selch at the time, so that's how they survived. But at the same time, I think that because she already knew the future from us to begin with -- we specifically told her that these three survived the sundering -- once she realized she was going down the same path, she would have figured he (and they) would survive regardless.
In other words, having decided that the Ancients were going down the wrong path that would never work, she embraced the future the WoL told her was going to happen, believing that the WoL would be able to defeat Endsinger after all. So she was aware of all the pain everyone would have to suffer to get to that point, but she chose that path regardless believing it was the best shot they had. If she had tried to do something to alter that (to make sure Emet-Selch would *not* survive, for instance), even if she could, she would end up going down an unknown path.
Yoshida's main point in this whole discussion (that came up in the later answer) was that the ability to unilaterally declare the world's fate like this made her just as much of an Ancient as Emet-Selch, Hades, and the rest (very literally playing god), but, as we saw, her answer just happened to work out. (As Emet-Selch admitted, their methods wouldn't have gotten them that far.) So Yoshida said that, although the game did show that she wasn't evil, it'd be fair to have the same kind of objection Alphinaud had about Emet-Selch at the end of 5.0, since Venat too didn't really have the right to pass judgement on all people the way she did, even though he (and the game) pointed out that she agonized over this very thing.
To the point some others raised in the thread about the idea that maybe if she had come clean to all the right people they could have come up with a different way is obviously the question of the ages. But I suppose the argument here is that she reached a crossroads where the ancients were going to sacrifice even more of themselves to Zodiark (despite attempts to convince them otherwise, which we see symbolized in that scene), so at that time Venat thought she had to commit. No one can say if she was Right, but in the end it got the job done.
I mean, in fairness, it's not every day you meet someone from the future who seems to possess the exact qualities that appear to be needed to face the enemy (and had already shown an ability to communicate with her in ways that all the other ancients could not). Granted there may be infinite possibilities, but this certainly helps to bias the selection of options. (If it were just some random encounter, that'd be one thing, but as you see everything around you falling into place exactly the way they described despite clear efforts to stop it...)


Reply With Quote



