Why can't it be both? Characters can have more than one motivation and reason for their actions. Neither of those reasons for the sundering contradict each other.She even contradicts herself back to back on the same cutscene. She first says "yeah Y'shtola, it's as you say, I sundered creation so you'd be better equipped to confront dynamis" and then IMMEDIATLY follows with "when confronting Zodiark he was too powerful so my only choice was to sunder creation to diminish his power." So, which is it?
Indeed, but it kinda kills it when you say "yes, it's as you say" and then follow with a completely different reasoning for your actions.
Actually no. She says "my only recourse was to rend him asunder to diminish his power". She says she had no choice. So in this particular case you can't have your hand forced and also try to play smart like "yes, I had this clever idea about how to handle dynamis so that's why I did it".
Last edited by Sicno; 02-07-2022 at 06:01 PM.
Naoki Yoshida:
Source: http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/113554 at 1:14:22...Similarly, these older MMOs also had a system where your house would break down if you didn’t log in after a while in order to have you continue your subscription, but this is a thing of the past and we won't have any system like that.
I don't think Eara was being particularly toxic at the time. I guess 'echo chamber' is a bit of a brash way of putting it, but it was at a point in the thread where most everyone around had the same opinion on the plot, so I don't think it was necessarily inaccurate, and I don't even agree with her.
As for the Dynamis introduction, I too was really not okay with how convenient and out-of-nowhere it felt for appearing at the end of a saga like this. 'Esoteric' or not, the idea that there is an essence that comprises MOST of the universe and exists alongside aether, (which was previously known to account for everything) yet is entirely unknown to all but a 'select few scholars' is unbelievable to me. An entire society of curious academics who essentially exist solely to further their knowledge and nurture the star, and no one seems to care about a UNIVERSE-spanning energy?
It’s moreso the way it’s used, it was pretty denoting of peoples opinions, especially when it’s one that she herself hasn’t reacted positively to, she even herself acknowledged she was being snarky. Disregarding that though yes, i personally think objectively Dynamis is a very poor writing decision. To implement something that powerful and important this late in the game just to basically excuse power of friendship plot armor and asspulls is extremely lazy to me. It’s like they couldn’t actually find a way the sundered were better than the ancients so they had to invent this whole new dynamic that somehow is so foreign in the entire universe and on our own planet. I really wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt for it, especially given how much they delayed this expansion but they really failed to sell me on much of anything. Waiting for the end of this 10 year arc and it just felt like they focused 99% of everything on emotional manipulation, feels, crying etc and just stopped caring about an actual coherent plot line. Which to be fair, i don’t entirely blame them for. The community has shown time and time again they care less for a coherent story and moreso about the fluff and slice of life anime the game has slowly become.I don't think Eara was being particularly toxic at the time. I guess 'echo chamber' is a bit of a brash way of putting it, but it was at a point in the thread where most everyone around had the same opinion on the plot, so I don't think it was necessarily inaccurate, and I don't even agree with her.
As for the Dynamis introduction, I too was really not okay with how convenient and out-of-nowhere it felt for appearing at the end of a saga like this. 'Esoteric' or not, the idea that there is an essence that comprises MOST of the universe and exists alongside aether, (which was previously known to account for everything) yet is entirely unknown to all but a 'select few scholars' is unbelievable to me. An entire society of curious academics who essentially exist solely to further their knowledge and nurture the star, and no one seems to care about a UNIVERSE-spanning energy?
I feel like you're getting too caught up in the particulars of her phrasing. "Yes, creating life that can interact with dynamis was one motivation - also, the battle with zodiark necessitated the sundering to diminish his power so he could be bound"Indeed, but it kinda kills it when you say "yes, it's as you say" and then follow with a completely different reasoning for your actions.
Actually no. She says "my only recourse was to rend him asunder to diminish his power". She says she had no choice. So in this particular case you can't have your hand forced and also try to play smart like "yes, I had this clever idea about how to handle dynamis so that's why I did it".
Is this particular to the english translation? iirc the Japanese dialogue her answer to Y'sthola was more along the lines of ,"Well, yes, but..." and Y'shtola's dialogue came off more like she was theorizing rather than asking a direct question.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.