
You’re literally wrong. I can literally see the same logs as you.We literally have the logs showing that reaper is absolutely over performing. It by an far has significantly more raid utility than DRG and NIN and its destroying both in both rDPS and aDPS and in most fights its outperforming MNK and SAM (MNK being another job that needs a nerf to bring it down to DRG/NIN levels)
Looking forward to monks getting positionals removed to appease players who yet again don't even play the job at the level cap on a regular basis if at all, followed by interest in the job plummeting to previously unknown levels of "complete lack of interest" for endgame content, followed by yet another half-hearted apology from SE claiming that fixes are still coming.

There's someone in this thread that's trying to use top adps logs as any sort of statement on job balance and you're on this guy's ass?
ADPS only measures skill within a job when compared within a job. It has nothing to do with balance. It should never be brought up in a balance discussion.
What matters is ability-to-clear. Not an ability to top meters (that's player driven not game-driven), not the 99th percentile, but the output of players across a spectrum of skill levels so they can clear.
'But but but week one savage clears'
They don't balance around week one savage clears either. They balance around a longer timeline for savage clears.
SE literally does not give a shit about orange parsing or parsing. They care about clears.
Yes, I am riding on the guy who deliberately misinterprets the data across the entire spectrum, in game tooltips, makes appeals to emotion while simultaneously decrying any arguments against his statements as appeals to emotion, and has actively admitted to just being here to troll and has also admitted that maybe the job he's been defending in this thread might actually be easier to play while paradoxically getting angry about that very fact being pointed out. You got another question for me? Maybe a relevant contribution to the discussion? Or are you just here to play defense for a self-admitted troll?
Looking forward to monks getting positionals removed to appease players who yet again don't even play the job at the level cap on a regular basis if at all, followed by interest in the job plummeting to previously unknown levels of "complete lack of interest" for endgame content, followed by yet another half-hearted apology from SE claiming that fixes are still coming.

What in game tooltips have I misrepresented? What appeals to emotion am I making? I said I was trolling a person. What does that have to with trolling the conversation as a whole? What am I getting angry about? Let’s not make blatantly obvious straw men, please.Yes, I am riding on the guy who deliberately misinterprets the data across the entire spectrum, in game tooltips, makes appeals to emotion while simultaneously decrying any arguments against his statements as appeals to emotion, and has actively admitted to just being here to troll and has also admitted that maybe the job he's been defending in this thread might actually be easier to play while paradoxically getting angry about that very fact being pointed out. You got another question for me? Maybe a relevant contribution to the discussion? Or are you just here to play defense for a self-admitted troll?
Oh, please. Don't come crawling back into a conversation you claimed you were "done" with to play victim when you have wasted everyone's time with your singular brand of BS.
Looking forward to monks getting positionals removed to appease players who yet again don't even play the job at the level cap on a regular basis if at all, followed by interest in the job plummeting to previously unknown levels of "complete lack of interest" for endgame content, followed by yet another half-hearted apology from SE claiming that fixes are still coming.
This guy reminds me so much of people who obsessively watch Youtube and Twitch '' debates '' lol, or Twitter arguments.
He got a few buzzwords he loves to throw out as an '' I win '' button that don't actually apply at all.

That is not true. They all matter. rDPS isn’t the end all. It’s just what people think matters most because it’s what ff logs uses to rank. Now, what SE uses to balance I have no idea.There's someone in this thread that's trying to use top adps logs as any sort of statement on job balance and you're on this guy's ass?
ADPS only measures skill within a job when compared within a job. It has nothing to do with balance. It should never be brought up in a balance discussion.
What matters is ability-to-clear. Not an ability to top meters (that's player driven not game-driven), not the 99th percentile, but the output of players across a spectrum of skill levels so they can clear.
'But but but week one savage clears'
They don't balance around week one savage clears either. They balance around a longer timeline for savage clears.
SE literally does not give a shit about orange parsing or parsing. They care about clears.
I think people look at rdps because that is the fairest assesment of how much damage you contributed to killing the boss, it's weird because it gives credit to the buffer instead of maybe a samurai playing perfectly and boosting your rdps, so performance wise your rdps is at least kinda out of your control, but when it comes to balance it shows how good your buffs can be, which coming back to the discussion, shows reaper's buff to be pretty good, i dont see why you should disregard that, this is literally just a fact, it is barely worse than battle litany while rpr's adps is way higher than drg.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote




