Results -9 to 0 of 252

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player BrokentoothMarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    282
    Character
    Niku Yuku
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by RyuDragnier View Post
    The EE is a collection of information written by individuals in-universe, meaning any knowledge they do not have is reflected in the EE. Dynamis, or should I say akasa, is something nobody had any concrete proof existed until now, as everything prior to this was just treated and assumed to being the work of aether.

    Also, because we don't know the exact mixture of dynamis and aether, this is not a contradiction. You're creating a giant meteor out of aether, that does not change if dynamis is added to the equation. You used a ninjutsu to summon all these blades and fire them into your opponent, that does not change with dynamis added. You released an excess amount of elemental aether to heal and revive your allies, this does not change with dynamis. All dynamis serves as is the equivalent of a force acting as an extra push upon it, strengthening it or making it easier to perform it.
    But while we know LBs are aether based, we know nothing as to whether dynamis is added nor how much dynamis can replace aether. Whether it can replace aether at all. Whether it can be all-dynamis or all-aether and the ramifications of either one. Essentially, your case is both speculative and is a show of someone trying to make excuses for a device that has little reason to exist and was presented poorly, adding to this confusion to begin with. I'm sure they'll go back and say "There's TOTALLY dynamis in LB now, trust", but we can't pretend like that doesn't add to the contrived nature.

    Using your logic, I can say LB's also rely on the power provided by invisible extra-dimensional pink elephants with psychic abilities. You wouldn't be able to deny me, as I can state that the EE had no knowledge thereof, so clearly I have a case that cannot be discounted despite how outrageously ridiculous the notion may be. This is why I'm averse to the idea even with these trace avenues of justification because even they will fail to adequately represent something we should have had at least an inkling about long ago.

    This was just poor writing, plain and simple. Given the great work we've received before, I'm disappointed we've resorted to the literary equivalent of "ive got a special gun that none of the other kids can protect against because its super omega sekrit and pourfull" on the playground.
    (8)
    Last edited by BrokentoothMarch; 12-22-2021 at 12:07 AM.

Tags for this Thread