Quote Originally Posted by Lauront View Post
Which it fails to do, for a multitude of reasons. The problem here is that the "empirical proof" is severely tainted and amounts to little more than rushed narration. It's all the more easy for me to simply reject it on that basis.
And ... I don't see any of that, unless you gonna point them out? Are you referring to the fact she pushed some society that was on the brink to their death? I don't see that as taint result. She only did that after seeing it already happened to hundred of worlds (without her meddling) so now she just decide to hasten the process. Again, is this true in "real life", maybe yes maybe no, but it's clear from the story framework it's meant to be taken that way.

I guess this is not something that can be reconcile. When I first finished the story I thought it's flaw too at first, but after a week and playing through some of the dungeon again, re-watching the cutsceens I start connecting the dots, and for me I believe I was able to see the intention of the writers, and I'm happy with it.