Yeah guys. 1 month free time is going to have to happen

[Overthier]

Yes, I have a quote from a brilliant man in my signature. Whom was also an economist and an expert on monetary theory. Perhaps you should listen to someone whom understands how bad government policy results in supply shortages, and makes it increasingly difficult for companies like Square Enix to acquire the products (hardware) they need to add servers and alleviate congestion.

Square Enix specifically cited these supply shortages caused by government policy as to why they're having problems.

Cause and Effect.

Lol some quotes from your Brilliant man -

1. "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

2. "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

3.(Speaking about MLK Day) What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."

This isn't getting into other stuff like his anti-Semitic views, Or his hate towards LGBTQ+ community. Or even the fact that he voted against making people be forced to report pedos they find downloading CP. But yes, you continue worshiping your "Brilliant Man"

[Saier]

Lol some quotes from your Brilliant man -

1. "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

2. "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

3.(Speaking about MLK Day) What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."

This isn't getting into other stuff like his anti-Semitic views, Or his hate towards LGBTQ+ community. Or even the fact that he voted against making people be forced to report pedos they find downloading CP. But yes, you continue worshiping your "Brilliant Man"

You legit rolled and smoked my dude Haseno over here man. I was searching for his response and there was none XD

[Overthier]

You legit rolled and smoked my dude Haseno over here man. I was searching for his response and there was none XD

Haha yeah i logged in this morning to check for a response, guess he decided to not respond.

[Haseno]

You legit rolled and smoked my dude Haseno over here man. I was searching for his response and there was none XD

You spoke too soon. I couldn't respond because this forum limits your posts per day. And no, he isn't capable of smoking me. Few on this forum could

[Haseno]

Lol some quotes from your Brilliant man -

1. "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

2. "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

3.(Speaking about MLK Day) What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."

This isn't getting into other stuff like his anti-Semitic views, Or his hate towards LGBTQ+ community. Or even the fact that he voted against making people be forced to report pedos they find downloading CP. But yes, you continue worshiping your "Brilliant Man"

Hilarious. This is why people really shouldn't comment on matters they aren't knowledgeable in. What you're referencing is something known as the Ron Paul Newsletters in which this language was included. What you aren't aware of is that Ron Paul was busy at this time pursuing his medical career and he had other people writing for the Newsletter whom are responsible for the words you used. That individual was removed from the Newsletter after these comments were made, and Ron Paul took moral responsibility for not properly conducting oversight of his newsletter. These comments never came from the man himself. But, the media desperately used this in order to smear him because he was a threat to the status quo.

Additionally, you bringing it up makes you look worse as you're only bringing it up as a form of character assassination in order to defame him and by extension myself because I'm an avid supporter of him. Which is of course a totalitarian tactic. This is why you tried implying that I must be psychologically broken because I quote him in my forum signature. Which is a huge leap in logic, or lack thereof.

Ron Paul is also not anti-semitic. In fact, some of his mentors and intellectual inspirations were Jewish. Such as Murray Rothbard or Ludwig von Mises. This claim he's anti-semitic originated from a slander campaign funded by the AIPAC lobbyist group because Ron Paul criticized the Israeli government and foreign aid.

As for the claim that Ron Paul hated LGBT. He's a man that has always advocated that government should not be involved in marriage nor violating the liberty of ANYONE.

Furthermore, Ron Paul delivered thousands of babies as an OBGYN for free for people of all beliefs and skin colors. He is a man of high intellect, moral character, and has contributed more to humanity than you ever have.

Since you wanted to go there. I clarified.

[Velnora]

Hilarious. This is why people really shouldn't comment on matters they aren't knowledgeable in. What you're referencing is something known as the Ron Paul Newsletters in which this language was included. What you aren't aware of is that Ron Paul was busy at this time pursuing his medical career and he had other people writing for the Newsletter whom are responsible for the words you used. That individual was removed from the Newsletter after these comments were made, and Ron Paul took moral responsibility for not properly conducting oversight of his newsletter. These comments never came from the man himself. But, the media desperately used this in order to smear him because he was a threat to the status quo.

Additionally, you bringing it up makes you look worse as you're only bringing it up as a form of character assassination in order to defame him and by extension myself because I'm an avid supporter of him. Which is of course a totalitarian tactic. This is why you tried implying that I must be psychologically broken because I quote him in my forum signature. Which is a huge leap in logic, or lack thereof.

Ron Paul is also not anti-semitic. In fact, some of his mentors and intellectual inspirations were Jewish. Such as Murray Rothbard or Ludwig von Mises. This claim he's anti-semitic originated from a slander campaign funded by the AIPAC lobbyist group because Ron Paul criticized the Israeli government and foreign aid.

As for the claim that Ron Paul hated LGBT. He's a man that has always advocated that government should not be involved in marriage nor violating the liberty of ANYONE.

Furthermore, Ron Paul delivered thousands of babies as an OBGYN for free for people of all beliefs and skin colors. He is a man of high intellect, moral character, and has contributed more to humanity than you ever have.

Since you wanted to go there. I clarified.

The funny thing about libertarians, is the amount of hypocrisy. Defending, Ron Paul, the guy that introduced (numerous times) the "Sanctity of life act", which would have defined life as beginning at conception at the federal level. That's really cute.

[Haseno]

The funny thing about libertarians, is the amount of hypocrisy. Defending, Ron Paul, the guy that introduced (numerous times) the "Sanctity of life act", which would have defined life as beginning at conception at the federal level. That's really cute.

Yet again, commenting on matters you're not knowledgeable in. Libertarians are not all on board with one another regarding that topic. Some view it as a violation of the natural right to life. So, it's not a matter of hypocrisy, it's a matter of people such as yourself being incapable of comprehending nuance on difficult topics.

[Velnora]

Yet again, commenting on matters you're not knowledgeable in. Libertarians are not all on board with one another regarding that topic. Some view it as a violation of the natural right to life. So, it's not a matter of hypocrisy, it's a matter of people such as yourself being incapable of comprehending nuance on difficult topics.

No, it's a matter of principle. Which is what they lack. Rights for thy, but not for thee.

[Haseno]

No, it's a matter of principle. Which is what they lack. Rights for thy, but not for thee.

Yet again, commenting with a lack of knowledge. The entire premise of libertarianism is that aggression against natural rights such as life, and liberty are violations. In reality, libertarians are acting on principle. Those principles just contradict your worldview

[Velnora]

Yet again, commenting with a lack of knowledge. The entire premise of libertarianism is that aggression against natural rights such as life, and liberty are violations. In reality, libertarians are acting on principle. Those principles just contradict your worldview

Of which, he is direct opposition of liberty. For being the party of autonomy, they sure like to pick and choose. But yes, continue saying buzzwords while feigning this pompous postering. Sounds like that edgy kid that sat in the back of class that already knew the answers.