Quote Originally Posted by CKNovel View Post
It's simple:
"I don't like the game and the story sticked with me."

Only LazyPeon and Quinn got a backlash, because they skipped the story and criticized the story.
Imagine if a big celebrity would watch the first 10 mins of Lord of the ring, then skip to the end of the last movie to then criticize the movie is bad. No doubt history would repeat.
Critics are welcomed, bias are not. And when you have a bias, you're pretty obvious about it if you start explaining why you don't lie X.

Easy example, everyone critics the pvp to not be attractive and everyone agrees with it. ARR was a slog (now it's a bit better), everyone agrees with it.
The game is not perfect, we don't know all its flaws and strength but we sure can recognize a bias against it.

They don't deserve the backlash because of how they played.


How about this. It is squares fault for having a boost in the first place, because in other games it is the normal to boost. So this company in a cash grab has a cash shop item that can ruin the game for certain amount of people. So that is the fault with the company.


It can easily be turned around like that, but that is not really my point. My point is, lazy peon, and Quinn both don't deserve to be attacked for having dumb takes.