Results 1 to 10 of 2126

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player RyuDragnier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New Gridania
    Posts
    5,465
    Character
    Hayk Farsight
    World
    Exodus
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Iscah View Post
    It's odd enough having Hrothgar when the beast tribes are talked about in such negative terms, but that seems to be handwaved by them being a race that has apparently always existed and always been regarded as "men" despite their appearance. You can't make the same excuse for Garleans, an existing race with an existing reputation.
    Considering how the "beast tribe" moniker was created by Ul'dah and Garlemald to excuse their racism, I don't doubt for a second Hrothgar were also called that when they first bumped heads with Eorzea before learning the common tongue. It would depend on what year they'd want to have had the Hrothgar having first met Eorzeans. I could easily see that term being used a lot for them in the early days before it slowly phased out of use for Hrothgar.
    (2)

  2. #2
    Player
    Iscah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,100
    Character
    Aurelie Moonsong
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by RyuDragnier View Post
    Considering how the "beast tribe" moniker was created by Ul'dah and Garlemald to excuse their racism, I don't doubt for a second Hrothgar were also called that when they first bumped heads with Eorzea before learning the common tongue. It would depend on what year they'd want to have had the Hrothgar having first met Eorzeans. I could easily see that term being used a lot for them in the early days before it slowly phased out of use for Hrothgar.
    In the past, quite likely, but in the story as it stands now they are apparently not considered beasts and have no negative consequences of looking like they do.

    Garleans, on the other hand, have a negative reputation now.
    (5)