Results 1 to 10 of 1087

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Rizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Quincy, Il
    Posts
    938
    Character
    Rizon Cerberus
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 81
    Quote Originally Posted by Starlord View Post
    Its really cutting it close, if its going to come out by the end of this month.... Information has to start pouring in by this coming Monday.

    PS: not raging, I'm just more worried about the Roadmap being followed which could lead to 2.0's Delay, Because for Lore Purposes, they need to tell a story that make sense with the Meteor and Such with each patch... so the more delays we get from 1.xx stuff the more 2.0 will get delayed by this purpose =(.
    When Yoshi-Ps post came out saying that 1.21 was going to be delayed I put forth the idea that he might want to revisit the timelines shown in the original roadmap and give us an updated roadmap with current timelines. I got blasted 10 different ways from Sunday in the forums. These continued delays could have an effect on when they distribute the new client to existing subscribers. When I aired this concern I was basically discribed as a Troll and idiot. I still think a reevaluation and report on the roadmap is appropriate.
    (7)

  2. #2
    Player
    Jashynvald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    78
    Character
    Jashmund Grandfury
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Rizon View Post
    When Yoshi-Ps post came out saying that 1.21 was going to be delayed I put forth the idea that he might want to revisit the timelines shown in the original roadmap and give us an updated roadmap with current timelines. I got blasted 10 different ways from Sunday in the forums. These continued delays could have an effect on when they distribute the new client to existing subscribers. When I aired this concern I was basically discribed as a Troll and idiot. I still think a reevaluation and report on the roadmap is appropriate.
    It would be nice if they did it, I agree, but it's low-priority and best and a waste of time at worst.

    If there's a delay, there's a delay. Push-backs of content releases are unfortunate but it's not like this is Valve or Blizzard saying "It'll be done when it's done."
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player
    Rizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Quincy, Il
    Posts
    938
    Character
    Rizon Cerberus
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 81
    Quote Originally Posted by Jashynvald View Post
    It would be nice if they did it, I agree, but it's low-priority and best and a waste of time at worst.

    If there's a delay, there's a delay. Push-backs of content releases are unfortunate but it's not like this is Valve or Blizzard saying "It'll be done when it's done."
    Please do not get me wrong. If things are delayed so they can get it right I am all for that. I doubt that a review would be a complete waste of time because I am sure that these delays and effects are discussed in their planning sessions. I just think that it would be a good idea to give us an update shortly after the merge. Just my opinion.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    syntaxlies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    uldah
    Posts
    4,043
    Character
    Syntax Lies
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Leatherworker Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Rizon View Post
    When Yoshi-Ps post came out saying that 1.21 was going to be delayed I put forth the idea that he might want to revisit the timelines shown in the original roadmap and give us an updated roadmap with current timelines. I got blasted 10 different ways from Sunday in the forums. These continued delays could have an effect on when they distribute the new client to existing subscribers. When I aired this concern I was basically discribed as a Troll and idiot. I still think a reevaluation and report on the roadmap is appropriate.
    They said the current delays will not affect 2.0 or 1.22
    (0)
    Last edited by syntaxlies; 02-28-2012 at 03:19 AM.