Parsers add replayability for casual players

[Dzian]

How old is that message and would it hold for all GMs considering even that GM admitted to the limited/wrong text being used in the interface?

Regardless, it's an interesting wording there:

"...not constitute a breach of our rules, since they did not act with the sole purpose of disrupting your gameplay."

If being prevented from playing and clearing a duty because you were kicked is not a problem because it does not necessarily mean the ones who kicked you acted with the sole purpose of disrupting your gameplay, that reasoning could potentially be applied to other situations.

It's open to interpretation. One could argue that the person that got kicked from the party got kicked because they were preventing the other players in the party from clearing the duty. Which can be interpreted as harassment as that player is obstructing the gameplay experience of the rest of players in the party they were kicked from..

So while they tried to report the players who got them kicked. The players who got them kicked could just as easily also report the one they kicked for harassment by disrupting there gameplay experience...

I dont know where that screenshot came from but perhaps they joined a farm party hoping for a clear when they had no knowledge of the content being farmed and thus wasted everyone's time. Valid argument for harassment..doubly so if said player deliberately joined a party he really shouldn't be in.

Being prevented from clearing a duty because you were kicked isn't a problem if that player was preventing the other 7 from clearing the duty.

This is why they just blanket bomb it with different playstyles

[WoW]

This picture sums why some are against parsers. Replace ERP with illegal RP. ERP is Epic Raid Progression. Not what casuals have you believe.

[linayar]

It's open to interpretation. One could argue that the person that got kicked from the party got kicked because they were preventing the other players in the party from clearing the duty. Which can be interpreted as harassment as that player is obstructing the gameplay experience of the rest of players in the party they were kicked from..

So while they tried to report the players who got them kicked. The players who got them kicked could just as easily also report the one they kicked for harassment by disrupting there gameplay experience...

I dont know where that screenshot came from but perhaps they joined a farm party hoping for a clear when they had no knowledge of the content being farmed and thus wasted everyone's time. Valid argument for harassment..doubly so if said player deliberately joined a party he really shouldn't be in.

Being prevented from clearing a duty because you were kicked isn't a problem if that player was preventing the other 7 from clearing the duty.

This is why they just blanket bomb it with different playstyles

The sentence I quoted comes after saying:

"Even if there was a misunderstanding/confusion and players wrongly kicked you for some reason..."

So the emphasis is on the kick itself, not the reason for the kick. "Different playstyles" could just mean they don't like your choice in race/gender/glamour because the kick is what they say is ok.

The post even empathized with how there seemed to be no apparent reason for the kick, hence why the initial report, I would assume.

This picture sums why some are against parsers. Replace ERP with illegal RP. ERP is Epic Raid Progression. Not what casuals have you believe.

Nah, I think that sums up your ego. I don't think they care about your number as much as you think they do, if you even have that number.

[WoW]

Nah, I think that sums up your ego. I don't think they care about your number as much as you think they do, if you even have that number.

You obviously care, else you wouldn't ask that.

[linayar]

You obviously care, else you wouldn't ask that.

I didn't ask a question. Again, must be your ego confusing you.

[WoW]

I didn't ask a question. Again, must be your ego confusing you.

I never said you asked a question either. But it seems you care a lot about my numbers. Maybe one day I'll grace you with my logs! But you have to prove to me that you're worthy first.

[xxmiamorecadenza]

I never said you asked a question either. But it seems you care a lot about my numbers. Maybe one day I'll grace you with my logs! But you have to prove to me that you're worthy first.

I’m genuinely curious about your logs now cause I’m nosey af. Maybe one day I will prove myself worthy of such knowledge.

[Imora]

What the hell is illegal RP? Auto hits?

[NanaWiloh]

The sentence I quoted comes after saying:

"Even if there was a misunderstanding/confusion and players wrongly kicked you for some reason..."

So the emphasis is on the kick itself, not the reason for the kick. "Different playstyles" could just mean they don't like your choice in race/gender/glamour because the kick is what they say is ok.

The post even empathized with how there seemed to be no apparent reason for the kick, hence why the initial report, I would assume.

Nah, I think that sums up your ego. I don't think they care about your number as much as you think they do, if you even have that number.

No its the other way around. Upper crab should be trying to drag the lower crab up to it.

[SturmChurro]

No its the other way around. Upper crab should be trying to drag the lower crab up to it.

Wouldn't that... be a good thing?