Parsers add replayability for casual players

[Awha]

I don't want to sound rude, but it feels like you just have some personal issues with parsers. You keep talking about how you can guarantee that sooo many people were bullied, yet I see no proof or examples or your "personal experiences".
I can talk about my Personal Experiences too, and people don't use tools to trash on others in those.


Your words from your previous posts.
I've used tools like parser in different games, yet it didn't affect me the way it affected you.
As I said before, please stop talking for everyone.

Meh I am all for parsing but let us not kid ourselves people were and will be bullied for their performance in a more open manner then currently.

Though the true crux of the issue is not that tool will be misused but whether that is really an issue that needs to be dealt with proactively instead of reactively with reports, and will reports put such a strain on the current GM staff that would it warrent extra cost and or would it deter people from joining at such a rate that it would hault the growth of tbe game in a meaningful way.

Issue is no side really has the means to answer said questions which foster this well we cannot be certain either way so let us err on the side of caution.

Do not agree but I get it.

Personally I don't mind Parsers and think they are a good tool for measuring yadda yadda yadda but I also acknowledge and understand the distaste of dealing with those who use it to be toxic or down right abusive. People like to tack on all sorts of agendas and assumptions to this topic to the point even the word "Parser" is controversial with no context.

We all know it can be good. We all know people use it for bad. If the subject is met with INSTANT Hathfields and McCoys levels of war there's no way the devs are endorsing it.

What we got right now with the "Blind Eye" Approach is as good as you can get for a compromise for something that's "Technically" against ToS. You have it, You get to use a Parser, YOU WON. Anything "Official" is going to be garbage compared to what's out there now so why such a heavy push for something that you'll complain about anyways?

Ets Just Gaem, Why Yu Heff To Be Mad?

Personally I have an issue with the blind eye approach since I have a inherent disdain for selective rule enforcement. Rather they just openly said you csn use a parser but if you misuse and are found guilty action will be taken against your account.

Instead just don't ask don't tell. Though my issue I had with person I asked the original question which resulted in me wondering what exactly is wrong with removing or not wanting to play with a random person that does not meet whatever standard the group may have.