There seems to be a disconnect here. If we're talking about "sides", then I am most probably most apt in the "take it easy" side instead of "removing any underperformers immediately out of my sight" side, but even if I am have a very high tolerance of people not performing at the level that they 'should' be, the following is still true:
- Of course I would be annoyed if people couldn't do very basic stuff like dps not doing AOEs or healers only spamming cures in mid or high level dungeons. Heck, Tanks pulling only 3-4 enemies at a time annoy me somewhat too--although this one I tolerate a lot more since I just tend to go with whatever the Tank is most comfortable with and not make a fuss out of it, it's not a big deal. Wall to wall pull do makes me smile when it happens, believe it or not!
- Of course I would be annoyed when people deliberately do stuff like AFK or trolling. Heck more often than not when I encounter players like these it is I who first launch the votekick procedure.
That being said,
- I am really baffled about the "I don't want to be bothered giving feedback" attitude while at the same time bemoaning and lamenting the overall alleged skill deficiencies of the community over and over and over again. Even more, the attitude of "I don't care or don't want to care about your situation, if I see you underperforming I won't ask why I would just simply try to remove you"--I am just a bit surprised at such callous disregard to this thing called "empathy" towards other people.
- Related to the above, I find it extremely hard to believe that "people giving feedback to players" are in any danger of getting their account nuked by Square. I don't believe this at all. I've spent thousands of hours playing this game and I gave and receive feedback when things got out of hand very often and not a single time I got thrown in the Gaol or even receive a warning. This is probably because I favor to communicate with other players in a reasonable and measured manner, even when I'm pissed off at them.
- Yes, as Alxyzntlc mentioned above, the conversation has seemingly moved on to this ridiculous notion that there are a strata of players (the "elite") that must be "protected" at all cost from all other players they deem insufficient to be playing together with them. This, I just simply couldn't wrap my head around in. And yes, before in this thread I specifically asked these types of players to talk in a more practical manner: what needs actually to be done to satisfy you all? Because talking about how the "community" is "enabling" the alleged "toxic casualism" without offering any concrete way to deal with the situation is just in the end empty talk that will get to nowhere. What should be done to improve the situation?


Reply With Quote





