I was issued a warning no info given. Thought our party finder issues were resolved?

[Zanzajin]

You mean strike her? The reporter has no need to tell the reportee why they reported then, only to tell the reviewer, Ie the gm in this case.

The GM should tell the reason as to why they are being reprimanded. The reporter need not tell the reportee anything.

[Cerver]

Carm is having some issues getting these to show up, so I will post them

[van_arn]

That gm should’ve given them another strike for talking back and threatening them.

Edit: before getting all mad read the conversation above and how combative the response. And then watch as this behavior continues in this very thread.

Also edited for clarity.

[RavenEbonclaw]

That gm should’ve given her another strike for talking back.

Can't take comments from someone taking up for themselves and demanding an explanation? Take the misogyny elsewhere. lol.

[van_arn]

That has to be without a doubt one of the most ignorant things I have read today. You cannot expect someone to be reprimanded at their job and not given a reason for said reprimand. That's effectively telling them they did something wrong and not fixing it. You don't discourage misbehavior by not telling someone they did something wrong. That's ludicrous. "Nothing more ominous than not sharing the because you advertised your Roleplaying venue in a game with a roleplaying community! Heaven forbid you do something so heinous!"

No, with the erp community (masquerading as rp community) it wouldn’t make a difference. Had the gm given specifics, this would just be a thread about “how thing gm shared is unfair, fire the gm.” Or “how to dodge oddly specific behavior complaints but keep doing said behavior.”

Definitely better to not give any specifics at all and let the erp community (masquerading as rp community) eat itself.

[Ralph2449]

That gm should’ve given her another strike for talking back.

How very authoritative of you, this kinda makes it kinda obvious you are just baiting people

May i suggest more subtle forms of trolling?

[Bsrking5]

That gm should’ve given her another strike for talking back.

Geez, where do you think this is, china?

[RavenEbonclaw]

There are literally screenshots from GMs saying it's ok. Argument invalid.

[RavenEbonclaw]

That gm should’ve given her another strike for talking back.

Would it be more appeasing to you if i was barefoot in the kitchen and offered him a sandwich?

[van_arn]

Can't take comments from someone taking up for themselves and demanding an explanation? Take the misogyny elsewhere. lol.

I’m only responding to the content you’ve provided. If your first reaction is to accuse me of misogyny when I don’t particularly care if your avatar matches your “real” personage, that really does make me think a gm shouldn’t have stopped at one warning.

Again, I’m referring to the conversation you shared publicly; the gm was clear there is no argument to have, but you went straight for an attack.