I dont understand why the lore is still being used as an argument when even the devs already confrimed that it isnt the lore stopping them at all, and that if they can add it and it's worth it they will, regardless of lore.
I dont understand why the lore is still being used as an argument when even the devs already confrimed that it isnt the lore stopping them at all, and that if they can add it and it's worth it they will, regardless of lore.
What gets me is people who come out swinging with stuff like "lore can never be a reason to not implement something" thats not my argument. I have never argued that something "cant" happen for X reason; on this subject. Male Viera can happen if the devs make it happen.No one said that the lore isn't what's stopping the devs from implementing.
I also fail to understand where this idea that "Lore is stopping them" is remotely part of the argument.
SE bends lore all the time, they literally do it to suit whatever writing they want. We’ve seen it with MSQ multiple times and they’ll most likely do it whenever Male Viera are implemented. You can argue all the lore reasons whether it’s male moons or Whm whatever is the same because in the end it will be bent by SE to suit their needs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.