Roleplay/Partyfinder Discrepancies & Policy Enforcement by GM's

[LittleImp]

But according to Oxford, RP'ers are doing it right since they're just throwing social gatherings, IE: a party, for entertainment.

This may just be one of the most intentionally obtuse responses I've ever seen on the forums.

Party has a specific and narrow definition in the context of the game. Don't be dense.

[Aurou]

This may just be one of the most intentionally obtuse responses I've ever seen on the forums.

Party has a specific and narrow definition in the context of the game. Don't be dense.

Party can mean a variety of things in the context of the game. Just because you don't agree with me, doesn't mean I'm dense. They are still gathering people for entertainment, IE: a party. Whether it's the traditional "game mechanic" version of a party or not is irrelevant.

There's nothing wrong with RP venues posting in PF and I honestly look at PF first if I want to go to a venue before trying to sort through anything else. Which I don't since I rather not leave game to seek something in game. Just imagine raiders being told not to post party finders for their statics and having to use other means to find people. A lot of people would be raging in the other direction then.

[LittleImp]

Party can mean a variety of things in the context of the game. Just because you don't agree with me, doesn't mean I'm dense. They are still gathering people for entertainment, IE: a party. Whether it's the traditional "game mechanic" version of a party or not is irrelevant.

There's nothing wrong with RP venues posting in PF and I honestly look at PF first if I want to go to a venue before trying to sort through anything else. Which I don't since I rather not leave game to seek something in game. Just imagine raiders being told not to post party finders for their statics and having to use other means to find people. A lot of people would be raging in the other direction then.

The realization that your original reply wasn't just a joke has left me genuinely astonished, congratulations. I am not an accomplished enough mental gymnastic to take you seriously.

I also don't think raiders would be impacted that much if static recruitment was banned from PF; Most people recruiting for statics are using other platforms to do so these days, it's just a lot more convenient.

[Silverrr]

Party can mean a variety of things in the context of the game. Just because you don't agree with me, doesn't mean I'm dense. They are still gathering people for entertainment, IE: a party. Whether it's the traditional "game mechanic" version of a party or not is irrelevant.

There's nothing wrong with RP venues posting in PF and I honestly look at PF first if I want to go to a venue before trying to sort through anything else. Which I don't since I rather not leave game to seek something in game. Just imagine raiders being told not to post party finders for their statics and having to use other means to find people. A lot of people would be raging in the other direction then.

No one would give an f, most static recruitment is done on discord anyway not pf