Roleplay/Partyfinder Discrepancies & Policy Enforcement by GM's

[Jeeqbit]

This GM needs to be investigated by the SE support team managers for inconsistent policy enforcement and potential abuse of power, and maybe even be removed or suspended from duty based on this.

They seem a really good GM from what I've seen. There's no evidence they have done anything wrong.

We should just assume this is the policy. If internally they decide it's not, they can do whatever internal processes they see fit (like investigations).

[ForteNightshade]

They seem a really good GM from what I've seen. There's no evidence they have done anything wrong.

We should just assume this is the policy. If internally they decide it's not, they can do whatever internal processes they see fit (like investigations).

A good GM... who has now warned and even banned several people despite no precedence every being set in five years.

If there is a new internal policy, it's extremely shady on SE's side because it essentially means they arbitrarily decided to change the rules without saying a word. Considering only one GM seems to be actively enforcing it, that only looks further suspect.

[ZackZero]

They seem a really good GM from what I've seen. There's no evidence they have done anything wrong.

We should just assume this is the policy. If internally they decide it's not, they can do whatever internal processes they see fit (like investigations).

Assumption of policy is not good policy. The quoted policies do not seem to apply outside of certain stretched circumstances.

That, and causing a community to get up-in-arms and raise things that are problematic about what was suggested as alternative isn't exactly good customer relations.

[Untimelydoom]

They seem a really good GM from what I've seen. There's no evidence they have done anything wrong.

We should just assume this is the policy. If internally they decide it's not, they can do whatever internal processes they see fit (like investigations).

Man this idea is the most backwards way of thinking I have ever seen. You let them just do whatever they like without anyone watching over them? That has gone super well recently in the real world (sarcasm 100% intended). When it comes to people in a powerful position, they also need to be checked. As I posted before, there is no rule that states this is allowed.

Once again because you have a problem w RP in PF, SKIP OVER IT. You do not have to pay attention to it. I promise it won't hurt you to keep scrolling (even though RP is at the bottom of the list every single time).

Side note, you play on Balmung, the largest RP server, you should expect Rp to be happening all around you. If you don't like RP then jump ship to another server.

[Jeeqbit]

Once again because you have a problem w RP in PF, SKIP OVER IT. You do not have to pay attention to it. I promise it won't hurt you to keep scrolling (even though RP is at the bottom of the list every single time).

Side note, you play on Balmung, the largest RP server, you should expect Rp to be happening all around you. If you don't like RP then jump ship to another server.

I don't really understand why you assumed I don't like RP. That's why I joined Balmung to begin with.

Just defending the GMs that's all, who without evidence to the contrary, are probably just doing their job. I agree this thread should be here (to make the frustrations known to SE generally).