Let me try to make a quick analogy.

Imagine you are in a car on the freeway, and you enable cruise control; now the car is maintaining the speed you set (so that your foot doesn't cramp on the pedal, or you don't get sort of road-hazy and speed up beyond the speed limit).

It is not, however, driving for you; you still have your hands on the wheel, you are still in control of the car. The car is merely assisting you in the task. This is what's referred to as Level 1 (or 'Hands On') in engineering terminology for self-driving vehicles.

Now let's imagine you have a Level 5 system, "Steering Wheel Optional"; this is a hypothetical car where you can just get in and sit in the back and not worry, the car drives itself entirely. You could nap, or read a book, or watch a movie; the car does everything for you.

Assistive technologies to help with accessibility are the equivalent of Level 1 self-driving; they are there to help you, not to drive for you (or play the game for you).

Setting up a script to buy a house for you is the equivalent of Level 5 self-driving; you can ignore the system entirely. In the car analogy, you are not driving; with regards to the game, you are not playing. You can set up the script and wander off to a restaurant for dinner. Go see a movie. Visit a friend. Go to bed. Sleep. Wake up the next moring, grab breakfast, then go check on your script.

That's not playing the game. That is a bot.

In fact, they're sort of targeting completely opposite goals; assistive (Level 1) stuff is meant to help someone be [i]able[/b] to play the game; they still want to actually do the things themselves, they just want a way to be able to do it.

Fully automated (Level 5) stuff is meant to allow someone to benefit without needing to actually play the game at all.

They are not the same thing, and shouldn't be conflated as though they were.