Results -9 to 0 of 5788

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    SturmChurro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    7,073
    Character
    Sturm Churro
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Zanarkand-Ronso View Post
    So...is it just not ok to talk about or reference Au-Ra? Like I get that you like them and play one, but why is it ok to put down FemRoe so hard but anything against the Au-Ra isn't ok and you get super defensive?
    I brought up au ra in one post - complimenting another person's prior choices. I am talking about female roe in the female hrothgar thread, because female roe was used as a comparative basis in SE's own artwork. Not only that the Queen of Bozja - who is a roe - replaced a female hrothgar. So, there is actually a relevance in discussing ROE, there is no relevance in discussing au ra in this thread. Since that artwork also depicted female hrothgar being at comparable height to roe, with probably feline features. So, neither miqo'te 2.0, or au ra are applicable, in my opinion.

    I am not "putting down" roe* either. I am saying how it is. Simple as that. Some people like that aesthetic, I get that, but as I have said numerous times, I don't think it should be used as a basis for female hrothgar. Seemingly the references to female au ra, have been since I've been posting, and to me, they are jabs at my player avatar. Just like when I've been a female miqo'te in the past, because apparently, I cannot have diverse opinions, if I am playing either race. I have said for years, that I have wanted female hrothgar to be like male hrothgar, a beast race. Fierce, tough, athletic, proud. Closer to female highlander, and similar height as viera. Not hunched.
    (3)
    Last edited by SturmChurro; 02-14-2021 at 07:20 AM.
    WHM | RDM | DNC