Results -9 to 0 of 5789

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    SturmChurro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    7,073
    Character
    Sturm Churro
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Qurho View Post
    As a queer who would love to be crushed by a beautiful roegadyn woman, I have to admit that I don't really see how reusing the femroe frame for (theoretical) hrothgar women would be a disservice. It's not as though they have the exact same huge barrel chest and squat legs of the men.

    Which, while I understand the want for female hroth to have minimal sexual dimorphism in a game that's really atrocious about it and would not mind such... But, speaking honestly, as much as I love my character I really hate how I have to fight to get a lot of glamours looking okay on him because of the above features, lmao.
    Umm.. Okay? To me (and most others), female Roe are closer to the male sex than female. That's why. They look terrible. Female hrothgar would already fill a niche for players who want a female beast race, if they actually decided to utilize femroe, it would most definitely make femhroth also look terrible, frankly. The queen(s) from Bozja look MUCH better with their custom body, than a regular femroe. People who want to be "crushed" ... or whatever... already have femroe.

    Also, I don't want them to look like humans either. They should be a beast race just like male hrothgar, rather than miqo'te 2.0, in my opinion. Just no femroe body, that would be a shame.
    (2)
    Last edited by SturmChurro; 02-13-2021 at 03:14 PM.
    WHM | RDM | DNC