No, the MSQ makes it very clear that the war was Nidhogg's to win at any time he pleased. The war lasted for a thousand years, because Nidhogg wished to torture them for as long as possible before finishing them off. While the Holy See DID use the war as a means to secure their legitimacy, the danger and desperation was very real The See was not doing anything to prolong the war for their own benefit, and there's nothing beyond player speculation to indicate that they had.
If you expand TIME, don't forget to expand DISTANCE, as well. Everything in the game is scaled down for player convenience. Azys Lla, by the same token, is enormous; while Thordan may have had days upon reaching Azys Lla, it very likely took him days just to get up to the Flagship, bypass the Allagan defenses, and access the Singularity Reactor. He didn't have time to sightsee. It's quite unlikely that he knew that Tiamat was there, so unless the Ascians told him about her, he would not have known. (And that's assuming that even the Ascians know about her - they are not omniscient, and it's unlikely that they kept track of each and every atrocity the Allagans committed.)
Additionally, there's a lot more we don't know about dragon eyes than that we do. We know they can be used as a power source. We don't know how EASY it is to use them as a power source. We don't know whether using one dragon's eyes is exactly the same as using another. A thousand years of using Nidhogg's does not mean he wouldn't be starting from square one while using Tiamat's. And that's even assuming Thordan knows how to use the Eyes he has! Use of the Eye of Nidhogg has been the duty of the Azure Dragoons since pretty much day one, and it's unlikely that Thordan has gone through Azure Dragoon training. The Asicans might be the only reason his plan was workable at all. They could probably have instructed Thordan in the use of Tiamat's eyes, as well, but because they did not encourage him to acquire them we can assume they either didn't know about her or felt it would have been time not well spent (whether this is due to typical Ascian overconfidence, or because it really WOULD have been a poor use of time is irrelevant).
I could go on; there's all kinds of potential reasons Thordan did not kill Tiamat, but, the bottom line is that we're once again at a situation similar to that of the "why not just" thread we had a couple weeks ago regarding dealing with the Light Aether the WoL was overcharged by. Players are imaginative. The writers cannot possibly anticipate every idea the players could possibly come up with - and even if they could, few would have the patience to wade through the walls o' text that would be necessary to cover every possible contingency. There comes a point where you have to accept that your clever idea isn't as obvious as you think it is (this is the first time I've seen it brought up, so it's not as though the majority of the playerbase has been scratching their heads thinking about it since Heavensward) - the writers either didn't think of it, or they have inside knowledge that would preclude it but felt that would be too clunky to write into the script, or it's perfectly VALID, but the writers still felt it would be too clunky to work into the script.
And, as imaginitve as you are, the others on this forum are just as imaginitive, and will be able to come up with counters that explain away the idea. And you will imaginatively come up with counter-counterarguments, and things will continue to go back and forth until folks get tired of debating.
Back in the days when I read Marvel Comics, there were often a section where letters from fans would be printed. Occasionally, letters exposing a continuity error would be printed as well - but the editors had a rule about those. If you wanted to see your mail printed, you not only had to talk about the error, but ALSO supply an EXPLANATION that solved it. (Doing so would also award you the prestigious "No-Prize" award - accept no substitutes!) I always saw this as a brilliant move. It's not hard to poke holes in a narrative - it's REALLY not hard at all. For even the most talented of writers, there's likely a reader out there who's even smarter. There's always a bigger fish, after all!
Narratives cannot be expected to be bulletproof; the best you can hope for is that what holes are there are not glaringly obvious holes. The "butcher Tiamat" hole is not one such hole.



Reply With Quote

