I'm gonna say something unpopular: I don't like to rush.

[linayar]

I do not think it is wrong for people to not want to deal with new players, or those wanting to practice.

Sure, but that has nothing to do with telling people not to play a certain role. Everyone has the option to leave a party they don't want to play with (or vote kick if it's an individual player).

[Awha]

Sure, but that has nothing to do with telling people not to play a certain role. Everyone has the option to leave a party they don't want to play with (or vote kick if it's an individual player).

I agree with that, my response was mainly aimed towards the comment that to roll tank you need be a master or gfto. For some groups that may be the case.

As you said they are free to remove them or leave.

[ItMe]

I agree with that, my response was mainly aimed towards the comment that to roll tank you need be a master or gfto. For some groups that may be the case.

As you said they are free to remove them or leave.

Hahah every time you try and agree with someone it sounds like you're trying to contradict them.
I'm not gonna lie, I started at your response to me for a good long while trying to figure out what to make of it.

[Awha]

Hahah every time you try and agree with someone it sounds like you're trying to contradict them.
I'm not gonna lie, I started at your response to me for a good long while trying to figure out what to make of it.

Question, is it okay to vote kick someone for wanting to rush if the group wishes to take their time?

I do feel most people would agree that it is a valid reason to remove someone. I also agree that it is a valid reason to remove someone, since at the core how they play differs from the overall group. Same could be said if a person wants to take it slower and the group wants to go quicker.

The reason behind why I think does not matter since by ib large that probably differs greatly from person to person.