In 6.0 could we fix the Pet Potencies, please?

[Nedkel]

My SCH is at 80, though, and I have an idea of how the class functions in difficult content. How about instead of deflecting, you address my concern? You see, I have this pet peeve: When someone literally has no frame of reference for a strong opinion on something, I call them out on it.

So either give me more details or stop parroting information you probably got from someone who does content you're not able to set foot in in the first place. Because I know why SCH is on the weaker side of the healers and I also know its stronger points as well. I know that you don't and that you also don't do content where those strengths and weaknesses matter. So please. Let me into that thought process of yours.

I am amazed on how easily you got triggered by 2 sentences to the point where you had to reach into lodestone of mine, to make incredible important point of your counter argument on my unimportant comment in a thread where nobody from SE is ever going to see.

My point still stands even if im 6 levels away from max lvl.
SCH is playable but that does not mean he is good, and by the comment previously posted in this thread by saying its in bad shape i meant that mechanically this job is a train wreck, with fairy responding slower than 20 action macro and the job itself having misleading potencies that are in reality 30% weaker, this kind of bug is just absurd. So yeah schoolar is in a bad shape and its also underperforming in comparison to other healers, both in rdps and heals. thats it

[Mhaeric]

and the job itself having misleading potencies that are in reality 30% weaker, this kind of bug is just absurd.

This is not a bug...

[KDSilver]

I am amazed on how easily you got triggered by 2 sentences to the point where you had to reach into lodestone of mine, to make incredible important point of your counter argument on my unimportant comment in a thread where nobody from SE is ever going to see.

My point still stands even if im 6 levels away from max lvl.
SCH is playable but that does not mean he is good, and by the comment previously posted in this thread by saying its in bad shape i meant that mechanically this job is a train wreck, with fairy responding slower than 20 action macro and the job itself having misleading potencies that are in reality 30% weaker, this kind of bug is just absurd. So yeah schoolar is in a bad shape and its also underperforming in comparison to other healers, both in rdps and heals. thats it

Scholar is good in both department.
Good healing doesn't mean crazy HPs. It means good mitigation and healing when needeed. As for rDPS, he is behind indeed. But not by a enourmous margin. Which is perfectly okay. We can't ask absolute perfect balance damage wise. Besides, when paired with AST, it actually shines because it's healing toolkit works really well with AST.

What's wrong with scholar currently isn't it's efficiency as a job or a healer, it is indeed the clunky fairy ghosting and "how" it's played, but that problem is the same for all healers.

As for the pet potency, it's not a bug. That's because the fairy healing doesn't scale the same as the owner, which is something that exists for a very long time. But it displays misleading potencies for the new players who don't know about that.