Your stance, plainly put, reeks of bias really. You don't want Astrologian, Gunbreaker, or anything else to count as a new job because you see that as somehow diminishing "Assassin's" non-existent chances. Yes, multiple jobs took a bit of time to get to a more solidified role. No, that does not mean that Astrologian in any meaningful way is an old job. When you can point to the bulk of its moveset and show how it ties in to Oran from FFT then you would have an argument. Show me Benefic, Malefic, Synastry, so on and so forth. You can't. I can do that with the bulk of the jobs in this game, the ones who can't? Basically the ones that I'm saying were made up whole cloth for this game. You can look at the history of White Mage and show where most of its skillset might have come from. XIV has made new jobs. Plain and simple. Beyond the scope of changing things so it fits into a new system. If you define a job by a name and nothing else then your stance for what constitutes a job is extremely shallow, and lacking in critical reasoning. When you call Astrologian an old job? That's what you're doing.