SMN Why don't we hear about egi glamours anymore?

[Grimoire-M]

Light isn't an "element" but you can still aspect Aether towards Light so it seems like splitting hairs in terms of distinction. If you can have light aspected Aether, which is what Sineaters and such are, then I don't see any issue with a Light aspected Primal. And Bahamut was specifically a Dark/Astral aspected Calamity.

Bahamut wasn't a Dark/Astral aspected Calamity. He's the only calamity that didn't have ANY aspect to it. That makes him the exception, not the norm.

[SpiralMask]

Bahamut wasn't a Dark/Astral aspected Calamity. He's the only calamity that didn't have ANY aspect to it. That makes him the exception, not the norm.

I could swear as well he was dark/astral-aspected, which was why he rocked the aetheric balance for the entire continent of eorzea at a fundamental level.

@egi-glam discussion: in the more recent restreams/commentary on the old liveletters, yoshi specifically mentions something to the effect of not being able to talk about egi-glamours for some reason (which to me implies some class changes would be incoming before those would be addressed, or they're tied to something specific (ultimate trials?))