Healer Unhappiness exists on the Jap Healing Forums as well.

[Raiya]

There are tons of this kind of messages on JP forums since 5.0 but SE doesn't care apparently.

They might not care or they're just to embarrassed to say anything right now because they failed to reform healing to the expectations of the player-base and are working away at fixing this again.

Personally I think they just need to take the approach they took to tanking to make healing better again, give back the aoe DoT's for WHM and SCH and balance out between abilities that protect and buff and those that damage. WHM should have burst heals and damage as well as getting rid of fluid aura and replacing it with Water as an aoe target spell, SCH shields, miasma II back and a good aoe heal which it initially lacked and AST continous HoT's/Dot's with the cards buffing like before but make them aoe and each having a different effect that either buff's allies (Haste/Damage/Critical) and debuffs (Slow/Def down/atk down) , if they add a 4th healer like Geo it should be a blood healer that damages while employing magics that drain opponents health to heal those damaging them. that would give all 4 variety.

[Mimilu]

They might not care or they're just to embarrassed to say anything right now because they failed to reform healing to the expectations of the player-base and are working away at fixing this again.

In Yoshi-P and the team's defense, they've learned since 2.0 not to say anything that isn't set in stone because the playerbase takes whatever they said and either treats it like dogma and backlashes when it either doesn't happen or happen in the way they wanted or criticizes the hell out of it before anything is finalized (not to say it isn't warranted/needed at times).
IF they are planning major healer changes, they're going to keep quiet so they don't see any backlash.

[althenawhm]

In Yoshi-P and the team's defense, they've learned since 2.0 not to say anything that isn't set in stone because the playerbase takes whatever they said and either treats it like dogma and backlashes when it either doesn't happen or happen in the way they wanted or criticizes the hell out of it before anything is finalized (not to say it isn't warranted/needed at times).
IF they are planning major healer changes, they're going to keep quiet so they don't see any backlash.

While thats true, at this point healers really could use some reassurance that the devs have even heard our complaints.
I dont even need them to say they are working on something at this point its been so long.

[Gemina]

In Yoshi-P and the team's defense, they've learned since 2.0 not to say anything that isn't set in stone because the playerbase takes whatever they said and either treats it like dogma and backlashes when it either doesn't happen or happen in the way they wanted or criticizes the hell out of it before anything is finalized (not to say it isn't warranted/needed at times).
IF they are planning major healer changes, they're going to keep quiet so they don't see any backlash.

When it comes to healing, we are beyond that. We know it; they know it. It isn't even the player demand for a response. The status of healing all by itself necessitates a response from them. Everyone could be completely oblivious to the current issues, and they would still have to say something. They don't need to be specific about any changes, but they do need to cast some kind of lifeline to get healers out of their tailspin in limbo.

It's either that, or they can just allow us to continue to believe that they don't care about healers.

[KDSilver]

In Yoshi-P and the team's defense, they've learned since 2.0 not to say anything that isn't set in stone because the playerbase takes whatever they said and either treats it like dogma and backlashes when it either doesn't happen or happen in the way they wanted or criticizes the hell out of it before anything is finalized (not to say it isn't warranted/needed at times).
IF they are planning major healer changes, they're going to keep quiet so they don't see any backlash.

While this is a valid point indeed, this is also one of the problem.
We barely get any responses at all. And when we somehow have some, they're out of touch and quickly passed.
During live letters, Tank and mostly DPS got some discussion around their rework and thoughts.
When in comes to healers, we get like, one sentence that comes from... i don't know where? I have some recent example.

- pre 5.0 : Sch let their co-healer WHM/AST do all the work while they dps, so we gave them more direct heal => excuse me what ? A lot of the healing output came from some of SCH greatest oGCD, how can they say that
- 5.15 Noct adjustment : Nocturnal AST struggle to heal so we ajusted some of its spells => Excuse me what ? While it's true nocturnal is not as fency as SCH (and this is a comparison that was pointed out about Noct.AST effiency), it was not to the point it was "hard" to heal with.

How can go in a go in a good direction between these no response and false response comparing to the real state of healer ?